Bug 425176

Summary:	Zoom On Hover cannot be disabled
Product:	[Unmaintained] lattedock	Reporter:	Drew <soldier9599>
Component:	application	Assignee:	Michail Vourlakos <mvourlakos>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal
Priority:	NOR
Version First Reported In:	0.9.11
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	Other
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Description Drew 2020-08-10 03:23:04 UTC

SUMMARY

I installed latte dock a few months ago and disabled zoom on hover. It was working as expected until today. I opened up the dock settings window, and zoom on hover was automatically enabled. The zoom on hover setting is now permanently stuck on 80%. I am unable to modify it. I need to be able to disable this because it makes the dock painful to use.


SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
openSUSE Tumbleweed
Linux: 5.7.11
KDE Plasma Version: 5.19.4
KDE Frameworks Version: 5.72.0
Qt Version: 5.15.0

Comment 1 Michail Vourlakos 2020-08-10 07:49:49 UTC

Are you sure the compositing mode is enabled in your system? 

v0.9.11 is not maintained, you can try git version instead.

Comment 2 Drew 2020-08-10 18:54:52 UTC

The compositor is enabled.

Before this happened I was messing around with the other layouts. I went to plasma, unity, and back to "My Layout" which I had already been using for months. Then I went into Dock Settings, and that's when I noticed it started zooming out of nowhere and I couldn't change it.

I fixed this by creating a new dock from scratch. It was weird because at one point I had the new and old docks enabled at the same time, and they appeared to have identical configuration, except that I could not modify the "Zoom on Hover" setting for the old one.

What do you mean 0.9.11 is not maintained? It is the latest version. How can it not be maintained?

Comment 3 Michail Vourlakos 2020-08-10 20:52:33 UTC

pretty simple, it is not maintained because I don't maintain it. If you find someone else to maintain it feel free to inform me. I develop only git, master version nowadays.

Comment 4 Drew 2020-08-11 01:25:52 UTC

I don't understand what you mean by "maintain." I have no expectation that someone is going to fix 0.9.11 and re-release it as the same version number, if that's what you're implying. The standard practice would be to release bug fixes with incremental patch numbers 0.9.12, 0.9.13, etc.

I also don't understand why you marked this as FIXED. Did you commit a fix?