| Summary: | Error messages while launching the application as Appimage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] kdevelop | Reporter: | Ricky Tigg <ricky.tigg> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | kdevelop-bugs-null |
| Status: | RESOLVED LATER | ||
| Severity: | minor | CC: | |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 5.5.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Fedora RPMs | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Ricky Tigg
2020-02-28 15:24:22 UTC
Sorry, I don't understand the report. Do all of those fail? I have no idea what firejail is, so I'm interested mostly in the first invocation. That does not display anything fatal in its output. Does that one not start KDevelop either? Might be related to Wayland, I don't know of anyone who tested the AppImage on Wayland so far. Just name the element that would have been cause of your assumed non-understanding. Good to hear your affinity with Firejail. That last has a dedicated option covering the use of files as Appimages for a puepose. Not testing that application according to Best Practises is beyond my understanding. Time to close. I have to rely on programs properly tested regards security. |