| Summary: | Two Okular launchers with the same name | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] okular | Reporter: | Lucia Mrenica <lucia.mrenica> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Okular developers <okular-devel> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | aacid, arojas, bshah, lucia.mrenica, nate |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 1.9.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Lucia Mrenica
2019-07-22 14:45:45 UTC
Bhushan what would be the solution here? Suggest the Archlinux people not to package okularkirigami? Because i don't think renaming Okularkirigami to Okular (Kirigami) is weird i guess since that's not the name we want it to show on Plasma Mobile > Because i don't think renaming Okularkirigami to Okular (Kirigami) is weird i guess since that's not the name we want it to show on Plasma Mobile
Sorry, i meant "i think it's weird renaming Okularkirigami", because on the systems it [mostly] targets (i.e. android / Plasma Mobile) it's *the* Okular
Now when building you need to choose if you want the mobile or the desktop version. |