| Summary: | Krunner runs the autosuggested command by default | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Plasma] krunner | Reporter: | Raphaël Jakse <raphael.kde> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Kai Uwe Broulik <kde> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | nate |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 5.15.5 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Raphaël Jakse
2019-05-24 16:06:02 UTC
The request in this bug would be a huge regression to my workflow. Needing to explicitly validate the autocompleted result would make using KRunner slower and require more brainpower. To me one of the biggest advantages is how you can use it practically at the speed of thought. I think one of the real bugs here is that "2+2" didn't give you the calculator as the top entry. > (And by the way, the result of the computation takes a > considerable time to show up the first time, but this is probably another > bug). Yep, it's Bug 406384, which has an easy workaround (see bug report for more details). From your answer, I guess there is no "one size fits all" solution here. I guess the workaround for me is to use ctrl+shift+→ a number of times then backspace + backspace. A solution could be to add an option to make KRunner behave like fish/zsh auto suggestion, but I would understand that it would be a pain to maintain for something that is not that significant. Thanks for referencing bug 406384 :-) Thanks. I'm going to close this for now, but we would definitely consider a reasonable patch. If you're interested in producing one, see https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/development https://community.kde.org/Infrastructure/Phabricator Thanks! All right, I don't have much time right now, but I'll definitely consider it later. It will probably be fun to do. Thank you, and thanks for your work on KDE :-) Your blog won a subscriber by the way. I think that's the nicest comment I've ever gotten from someone after closing their bug as RESOLVED INTENTIONAL! :) |