| Summary: | Original items visible in Thumbnails view | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | andrej.valencic |
| Component: | Setup-ImageEditor | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | caulier.gilles, cmprior, metzpinguin |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | 6.0.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 6.1.0 | |
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
andrej.valencic
2019-03-06 10:43:14 UTC
Did you use Windows or Linux ? Gilles Caulier Reload the metadata from these two images. Maik (In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #1) > Did you use Windows or Linux ? > > Gilles Caulier Both! Now I'm on Linux as on Windows I reverted to version 5.9.0 The cause is a correction of Bug 277502. Read comment 20. Reload the metadata fixes the DB entries. Maik (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #4) > The cause is a correction of Bug 277502. Read comment 20. Reload the > metadata fixes the DB entries. > > Maik I'm not sure how to that. I did Album -> Reread Metadata From Files but it still shows the original images as well. Anything else I shoud do? Just tested again, it works with old images with a new version and with newly added where I create a new version. Is it possible to provide the two images? Maybe only as private mail? Maik (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #6) > Just tested again, it works with old images with a new version and with > newly added where I create a new version. Is it possible to provide the two > images? Maybe only as private mail? > > Maik No problem, here are some of those: https://we.tl/t-scma7VFD2t If you need more (new) ones let me know. Git commit 00d67e8bbfba047e372374ee7c7c10a9dd1272df by Maik Qualmann. Committed on 06/03/2019 at 18:52. Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'. revert patch for the item history Related: bug 277502 FIXED-IN: 6.1.0 M +2 -2 NEWS M +1 -2 core/libs/database/history/itemhistorygraph.cpp https://commits.kde.org/digikam/00d67e8bbfba047e372374ee7c7c10a9dd1272df I have recovered the behavior of digiKam-5.9.0 but have not reopened Bug 277502 yet. The problem is how to save a new image in the Image Editor. We have 2 entries that are similar. The menu item "Save changes" saves a new image and the original is hidden. The menu item "Save as new version" also creates a new image with the same extension, but is a new branch and the original image is not hidden. Depending on what the user uses, he wonders that the original image is not hidden. So we have to think about whether we can explain it better, or if the original image is also hidden when creating a new branch. I do not think so, maybe use a different file name counter. Gilles, does you know how the correct behavior should be? Maik Well, we need to take a look other softwares which use versioning, as Darktable and lightroom. https://lightroomkillertips.com/understanding-lightroom-classic-photoshop-workflow/ In this page, the versioning is called "Stack with Original". A file name template is provided and can be customized (for me it's really to much complex and error prone.) I cannot found the same explanation for Darktable... Gilles *** Bug 408017 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |