| Summary: | Hide geolocation tags below images in thumbnail view | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Jens <jens-bugs.kde.org> |
| Component: | Albums-IconView | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles, metzpinguin |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | 7.0.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: | screenshot | ||
|
Description
Jens
2019-01-04 21:53:22 UTC
Can you give us a screenshot of this geo tags displayed below thumbnail ? Gilles Caulier Created attachment 130591 [details]
screenshot
The tags "Pfarrstraße", "L 85" and "Hinterlanddamm" are added by using Reverse Geotagging. They are not "normal" tags. They should not be shown together with the other tags.
There is no distinction between "normal" or geological tags. We have wishes from users to add a geological location tree to find images of places. Why don't you just reduce the tags to the country / place? Maik Because I want to find, filter, and group images by street name or POI. The area in question may not be a rectangular or circular area, e.g. all images within a certain city. I used to do this when using iPhoto. iPhoto automatically geotags all images and also includes a tolerance radius (which may or may not come from the camera that was used, don't know) so you can search by location coordinates but ALSO by street name, address, POI, etc. An alternative (that comes to my mind) would be adding a "Search by address/place" feature in the search and all filters, which takes an address or POI (anything Google/OSM can find), converts it into a shape on the map (an area) and then returns all images within this area. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 377228 *** |