| Summary: | Wrong layer numeration after deleting middle one. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] krita | Reporter: | n0dwis <n0dwis> |
| Component: | Layer Stack | Assignee: | Krita Bugs <krita-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | freebox64, halla |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 4.1.7 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
n0dwis
2018-12-28 07:49:42 UTC
Hi. I think it might be useful to know the reasons for changing how layers are named by default. (In reply to mvowada from comment #1) > Hi. I think it might be useful to know the reasons for changing how layers > are named by default. I don't understand. I think, layer number should just increase every time when it adding. Thanks for your comment! Automatically switching the status of this bug to REPORTED so that the KDE team knows that the bug is ready to get confirmed. In the future you may also do this yourself when providing needed information. The number starts from the number of layers in the image when reloading the image, not the last used number. Theoretically, we could save the state of the layer numbering, but only to .kra files, and then we'd have an inconsistency with other file types. I think we'll keep it this ways. (In reply to Boudewijn Rempt from comment #4) > The number starts from the number of layers in the image I understand. This is not really important thing. I worry about some kind of layers conflicts because of it names. Thank you. Layers have an internal unique id, so having more than one layer with the same name isn't going to confuse Krita. |