| Summary: | Feature request: Add 'Object size' to Overview list in "What's interesting" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] kstars | Reporter: | Pit <P.Suetterlin> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Rob <rlancaste> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | ||
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 2.9.8 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Pit
2018-10-16 10:53:42 UTC
Hey, sorry for not replying to this. I don't always see the bugs assigned to me right away. The object size is part of the data listed for each object already. If you click on the objects in the list, the size is in the details right after the surface brightness and magnitude. The size is not in the first screen because the space is very limited, so that space is just for position information, but it is on the screen once you click on an object. (In reply to Rob from comment #1) > Hey, sorry for not replying to this. I don't always see the bugs assigned > to me right away. :) No complaints from my side > The object size is part of the data listed for each > object already. If you click on the objects in the list, the size is in the > details right after the surface brightness and magnitude. The size is not > in the first screen because the space is very limited, so that space is just > for position information, but it is on the screen once you click on an > object. Then the proper request likely would be to clean out the overview a bit, is it? Like (just looking at the Galaxies page) only giving *one* name instead of 5, or specifying the type only once. Also, why positions with arcsec accuracy? How many people even can make use of, e.g., the RA coordinate and translate it into something that tells them where it is? Info like constellation, maybe transit time, and (sic...) object size would be more informative in an overview. All IMHO, of course ;^> |