| Summary: | Falkon forces Ads | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] Falkon | Reporter: | dS810 <artem.anufrij> |
| Component: | extensions | Assignee: | David Rosca <nowrep> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
| Severity: | major | CC: | kde |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: |
pihole only
pihole + adblock |
||
Created attachment 114197 [details]
pihole + adblock
why use adblock if you have pihole already? there are various blockers who do not harmonize, such as uBlock fights Ghostery. I guess one has to settle for a single one. This is nonsense, it doesn't "force" ads. If anything, the integrated AdBlock may fail to block some ads, but that may also be because of your filters. (In reply to KDErobo3me from comment #2) > why use adblock if you have pihole already? > > there are various blockers who do not harmonize, such as uBlock fights > Ghostery. > > I guess one has to settle for a single one. I use PiHole for my whole network. AdBlock is useful in hotels and public access points like train, bar etc.. Currently I have to switch on/off adblock in falcon. If I use chromium + uBlock so it works as expected and I haven't to desable it in my "PiHole" network. |
Created attachment 114196 [details] pihole only Hello guys, I use pihole as my DNS. If I enable AdBlock in Falkon it forces ads. attach #1: pihole only attach #2: pihole + adblock