| Summary: | akonadictl fsck: Show more helpful messages | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Frameworks and Libraries] Akonadi | Reporter: | Martin Steigerwald <Martin> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs> |
| Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | dvratil, nate, ndordea, richard.bos |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Martin Steigerwald
2018-01-29 16:38:46 UTC
That is with Akonadi 17.08.3 > Of course, even better would be if akonadictl fsck could fix the issues it finds. Yes, but not everything is an issue. > Some suggestions to improve the situation: > Item "1289323" has no RID. => > > Item "1289323" only stored in database, not locally in XYZ resource. > > XYZ should be the name of the affected resource. There are two problems: 1) The item can be owned by an online Resource (e.g. IMAP) and the Item may have no RID simply because the Resource wasn't online yet. In such case the situation above is not an error. 2) Your message is not precise. "locally in XYZ resource" is wrong, again in case of online resource. I don't want fsck to contain misguiding messages. In its own way, the current message (Item has no RID) is perfect, because describes the situation perfectly. I think the best way would be to just add a link to Wiki where the issue is described in detail. > Item "1360766" has RID and is dirty. => > > Item "1360766" has changes that are only stored in the database, not locally in XYZ resource Again, the case can simply be because the change couldn't be replayed by an online Resource yet because it's offline. Same solution as above would apply. > => Exactly tell which files are identically to give the user the chance to remove duplicate files. It is not obvious from the above: The "duplicate" refers to duplicate RID, meaning there are multiple Items stored in the database that belong to the same Collection and have the same RID. That in no way implies there's a duplicate in the backing storage (maildir or IMAP) and in most cases there's not even any actual file to refer to (e.g. IMAP). Thank you Dan, for your prompt responses. So I still misunderstood some of the error messages despite your explainations. I think this hints and the underlying issue: there is an akonadictl fsck, it often does not really fix the issue the user sees, yet it reports some kind of probable inconsistencies and leaves the user without anything sensible to do about… So I wonder about the purpose of it? Aside from the migration work it does, is it a developer tool? Whatever, no need to discuss it here. I reported what I think I understood from your answer on the mailing list. If there are different actions to be taken than the ones I suggest, feel free to close some of the reports I made. I just wanted to help to move this forward. I agree with this. In my case I get: # akonadictl --verbose fsck Looking for resources in the DB not matching a configured resource... Looking for collections not belonging to a valid resource... Checking collection tree consistency... Looking for items not belonging to a valid collection... Looking for item parts not belonging to a valid item... Looking for item flags not belonging to a valid item... Looking for overlapping external parts... Verifying external parts... Found 165 external files. Found 165 external parts. Found no unreferenced external files. Checking size treshold changes... Found 0 parts to be moved to external files Found 0 parts to be moved to database Looking for dirty objects... Collection "Search" (id: 1) has no RID. Collection "OpenInvitations" (id: 1416) has no RID. Collection "DeclinedInvitations" (id: 1417) has no RID. Found 3 collections without RID. Item "243448" has no RID. Item "243531" has no RID. Item "243813" has no RID. Item "243868" has no RID. Item "243869" has no RID. Item "243986" has no RID. Item "244023" has no RID. Item "244026" has no RID. Item "244111" has no RID. Item "244176" has no RID. Item "244379" has no RID. Item "244393" has no RID. Item "244399" has no RID. Item "319051" has no RID. Item "328336" has no RID. Item "328379" has no RID. Found 16 items without RID. Item "232461" has RID and is dirty. Item "239145" has RID and is dirty. Item "243363" has RID and is dirty. Item "328334" has RID and is dirty. Found 4 dirty items. Looking for rid-duplicates not matching the content mime-type of the parent collection Checking Notes Checking Notities Checking Search Checking akonadi_davgroupware_resource_1 Checking akonadi_vcarddir_resource_10 Checking akonadi_vcarddir_resource_11 Checking akonadi_vcarddir_resource_12 Checking akonadi_vcarddir_resource_8 Checking akonadi_vcarddir_resource_9 Checking DeclinedInvitations Checking OpenInvitations Checking https://<server>/remote.php/caldav/calendars/<user>/contact_birthdays/ Checking https://<server>/remote.php/caldav/calendars/<user>/default calendar/ Checking https://<server>/remote.php/carddav/addressbooks/<user>/default/ ___checking of all folders___ Migrating parts to new cache hierarchy... CRASH of akonadi! This happens now everytime. It worked before. Now how to make akonadictl fsck work again???! BTW: creating a bug report (with stackback trace) does not work :( Would be nice / good to give this attention at Akademy Dear Richard. (In reply to Richard Bos from comment #4) > I agree with this. Thanks for confirming the report. […] > Migrating parts to new cache hierarchy... > > CRASH of akonadi! > > This happens now everytime. It worked before. > > Now how to make akonadictl fsck work again???! However please do not use this bug report to report a crash of akonadictl fsck. Also please do not use this bug report for user support questions. Why? Cause this was the reason for many bugs having so many comments that that they are not useful for a developer anymore. Please help to keep this bug report clean, simple and about *one* issue, please help to keep it actionable. Thank you. Please file a different bug report. > BTW: creating a bug report (with stackback trace) does not work :( Then please use kdepim-users or another appropriate support channel to get help with that. Please refrain from further comments that are not related to this bugs issue. Similar issues . akonadi fsck / vacuum reports many issues/messages but did not give to the user any hints on how to solve them . What about having an option akonadictl fix [ noRID | dirtyRID ...etc ] ? Such tool will reduce the number of bugs reported by akonadictl fsck Also, what about telling the users : 1) procedures of fixing issues 2) procedures of getting rid on unnnecessary messages and/or 3) procedures of cleaning up the akonadi db of "dead" records and above all 4) how the user should access akonadi mysql db which is handled [ start/stp] by akonadi . See bug 406856 recently opened Thanks . Nick Just to confirm that this still happens with Akonadi 5.9.3 (KDEPIM/Akonadi 18.08). Here are some examples of an akonadictl fsck run after switching to PostgreSQL database backend just a few weeks ago: Looking for resources in the DB not matching a configured resource... Looking for collections not belonging to a valid resource... Checking collection tree consistency... Looking for items not belonging to a valid collection... Looking for item parts not belonging to a valid item... Looking for item flags not belonging to a valid item... Looking for overlapping external parts... Verifying external parts... Found 8951 external files. Found 2069 external parts. Found unreferenced external file: /home/martin/.local/share/akonadi/file_db_data/27/231727_r1 Found unreferenced external file: /home/martin/.local/share/akonadi/file_db_data/37/85637_r2 Found unreferenced external file: /home/martin/.local/share/akonadi/file_db_data/69/230869_r1 Found unreferenced external file: /home/martin/.local/share/akonadi/file_db_data/44/216944_r1 [… >6000 more of those …] Moved 6882 unreferenced files to lost+found. Checking size treshold changes... Found 0 parts to be moved to external files Found 0 parts to be moved to database Looking for dirty objects... Collection "Search" (id: 1) has no RID. Collection "OpenInvitations" (id: 360) has no RID. Collection "DeclinedInvitations" (id: 361) has no RID. Found 3 collections without RID. Item "1144154" in collection "266" has no RID. Item "1144155" in collection "256" has no RID. Item "1144156" in collection "256" has no RID. Item "1144157" in collection "256" has no RID. Item "1144158" in collection "256" has no RID. Item "1144159" in collection "256" has no RID. Item "1144160" in collection "152" has no RID. Item "1144161" in collection "180" has no RID. Item "1144163" in collection "266" has no RID. Item "1144164" in collection "256" has no RID. Item "1144165" in collection "256" has no RID. [… more of those …] Found 43 items without RID. Found 0 dirty items. Looking for rid-duplicates not matching the content mime-type of the parent collection Checking Search Checking Notizen […] Related bugs: - Bug 406958 - Unreferenced files in file_db_data - Bug 406087 - akonadictl fsck incorrectly reports success when file_lost+found folder is absent - Bug 406856 - Found 3734 items without RID.; Item "30024" has RID and is dirty. Hello Martin, Thank you for your email and your comments . I agree that some emails may be lost . I took the time to try making/finding some correlations with what the user sees . ----- First of all I converted to IMAP as per ip provider's tech-support . So the database contains records from the "old" [maildir? ] system and the new "IMAP" system . Also I had to move the database from my old machine to a new one [ in fact entire /home from old was transfered to the new machine ] So the same userid had acceess to the emails immediately after opensuse leap 15.0 was installed on the new machine ]. I do not know if these changes have any impact [ the hostname was chaged ] ----- Based on the way akonadictl presents its resulst it(akonadictl) is NOT a user friendly tool . On the contrary the actual reporting scares the user with those messages "no RID" or "dirty" or "records removed from data base and moved in lost-and-found" without at least to ask the user if [s]he wants/agrees with that move . I looked closely to pimitemtable and it seems that the column remoteId is nullable [ i.e. accepts an undefinned/unidentified/unknowm value ]. I believe that the hub of all these issues is not with the database server but with akonadi because switching between MariaDB and Postgresql does not stop the isses from happening. These problems in kmail-database are inherited from the time when kmail was using sqlite . In my humble opinion, the database server does what is told/comanded by the interface between the user and the database---that is akonadi---. It is strange that a such important item as remoteId was translated in a datamodel that accepts it as being nullable . That allows that any event that is not controlled by the code inserts/updates a record as having remoteId NULL, and from this all users' complaints . This assumption does not match the reality . I would like to know how it comes that receiving an email---which has a sender and a receiver--- is recorded in the database with a remoteId of NULL value ? I provide below some info collected from my machine before c;eaning up the records with RID NULl in pimitemtable . You van notice that that record had a valid collectionId but has invalid remoteId . I checked that many other emails with valid remoteId pointer to the same collection Id . I tend to agree with you that ..... `` However it also could be that Akonadi just messes up big time like in storing the items into remote storage, but somehow failing to store the remote ID or whatever. `` I believe that KDE development should have a look at kmail-database-datamodel if it matches technical-requirements and/or ifv akonadi handles the email requests properly . Also it is very dificult for the user to find any item that is wrong using kmail and not to dig in databse tables . That's the role of akonadictl and/or what ever any USER ORIENTED tools . I believe that akonadikconsole is too powerful for the casual user . At the same time akonadi&kmail seem to keep their cards close to the vest ..... making easy for developers to point to user errors . The users have had it for too long asking and asking and asking and nothing to be done . Thank you, Nick ========================= info from my machine ========================= -------------- describe pimitemtable -------------- Field Type Null Key Default Extra id bigint(20) NO PRI NULL auto_increment rev int(11) NO 0 remoteId varbinary(255) YES MUL NULL remoteRevision varbinary(255) YES NULL gid varbinary(255) YES MUL NULL collectionId bigint(20) YES MUL NULL mimeTypeId bigint(20) YES MUL NULL datetime timestamp NO current_timestamp() atime timestamp NO current_timestamp() dirty tinyint(1) YES NULL size bigint(20) NO 0 -------------- select count(*) from pimitemtable -------------- count(*) 8691 Record without RID as reported by akonadictl fsck [ 38264 item ... RID ] 38264 5 NULL NULL NULL 123 4 2019-04-05 01:12:16 2019-04-05 01:12:16 1 81206 collectionId 123 is one of directories under "Local Folders -------------- describe pimitemflagrelation -------------- Field Type Null Key Default Extra PimItem_id bigint(20) NO PRI NULL Flag_id bigint(20) NO PRI NULL -------------- select count(*) from pimitemflagrelation -------------- count(*) 13859 Records associated with id 38264 [ from pimitemtable ] 38264 1 38264 5 38264 12 38264 13 -------------- describe parttable -------------- Field Type Null Key Default Extra id bigint(20) NO PRI NULL auto_increment pimItemId bigint(20) NO MUL NULL partTypeId bigint(20) NO MUL NULL data longblob YES NULL datasize bigint(20) NO NULL version int(11) YES 0 storage tinyint(4) YES 0 -------------- select count(*) from parttable -------------- count(*) 30569 Records associated with id 38264 [ from pimitemtable ] 131077 38264 5 131077_r2 80258 1 1 131078 38264 6 X-Virus-Flag: no\nX-Virus-Flag: no\nFrom: ......\nTo: .......\nSubject: Fwd: Your ...... . 497 1 0 131079 38264 7 \0\0\0\0\0.... 451 2 0 131080 38264 8 \0\0\0*\0n\0d\0o\0r\0d.... 104 0 0 131081 38264 9 immediately 11 0 0 131082 38264 10 \0\0\0˰\0\0\0˰\0\0\0\0˰\0\0\0˰\02\0\0\0˰\0\0\0\0\0\0\0�X 32 0 0 131083 38264 11 moveTo5 7 0 0 131084 38264 12 97585928 8 0 0 |