Summary: | Reward apps that define good AppStream metadata | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] Discover | Reporter: | Nate Graham <nate> |
Component: | discover | Assignee: | Aleix Pol <aleixpol> |
Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
Severity: | wishlist | ||
Priority: | HI | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: |
Description
Nate Graham
2018-01-27 13:46:20 UTC
Would it make sense to make it instead a category? Something like "Best Apps" within Applications? I don't think we want to have hundreds of elements the first page. Not sure we'd want to say "Best apps" since that implies editorial review, which this obviously isn't about. I agree that hundreds of apps on the Featured page would be too many. Maybe we could show, say, the 5 or 10 most recently updated apps from among the list of apps with best-in-class Appstream metadata? Do we still want some of this? I think appstream information has improved over the years... Yeah, I think it's probably unnecessary now, and would in practice end up penalizing distros more than apps. |