Summary: | Open discussion on replacing Konqueror by Qupzilla. Why I think it may be a wrong move. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] konqueror | Reporter: | avlas <jsardid> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Konqueror Developers <konq-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | nate |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | Git | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: |
Description
avlas
2017-08-12 14:54:59 UTC
I linked a new issue in QupZilla git repo (https://github.com/QupZilla/qupzilla/issues/2408) to this KDE bug to let the QupZilla developer know about this. Thanks for the comments! The history and repos are not going to be merged, so that's not a problem. The programs *will* be separated (or rather kept separate), with Konqueror being unmaintained but still available, and Qupzilla (or whatever it will be renamed to) being actively maintained. Also, bugzilla ticket isn't the best place for a discussion of that nature. A mailing list is more appropriate. Bugzilla tickets need to be discrete, actionable, and resolvable. I'm closing this ticket so a discussion of the remaining concerns can take place in a more appropriate medium. (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #2) > Thanks for the comments! > > The history and repos are not going to be merged, so that's not a problem. > The programs *will* be separated (or rather kept separate), with Konqueror > being unmaintained but still available, and Qupzilla (or whatever it will be > renamed to) being actively maintained. > > Also, bugzilla ticket isn't the best place for a discussion of that nature. > A mailing list is more appropriate. Bugzilla tickets need to be discrete, > actionable, and resolvable. I'm closing this ticket so a discussion of the > remaining concerns can take place in a more appropriate medium. I see. Sorry, I should have used the mailing list instead. No problem at all! |