Summary: | Double-click on a file in the 'Save As' dialog should trigger save, as in the 'Open' dialog a double-click triggers open. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] kdialog | Reporter: | Sender <sender> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Brad Hards <bradh> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | sender, simonandric5 |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Sender
2017-07-31 15:29:32 UTC
> This change would speed up my workflow considerably.
Please explain your workflow where you frequently save files to a different, but already existing name.
(In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #1) > > This change would speed up my workflow considerably. > > Please explain your workflow where you frequently save files to a different, > but already existing name. > .. to a different, but already existing name. Not sure if I understand correctly, but that's not what I meant. The workflow I mean: replacing a file with a new file, using the same name. Current situation: 1) Double-click (or otherwise select) existing file (selects the file). 2) Click 'Save'. 3) Click 'Overwrite' in the next dialog. 4) New file replaces old file. Suggested situation: 1) Double-click existing file (selects the file and triggers 'Save'). 2) Click 'Overwrite' in the next dialog. 3) New file replaces old file. Like mentioned: this would be consistent with behavior of double-click in the 'Open' dialog. To illustrate: I need to serially download files and quickly review those. There is no reason to keep the file after review. The files are downloaded with the same name and I don't want more than 1 file to accumulate. In the current situation I need to manually remove the file after review, or replace the current file with the new file. I'm opting for the latter b/c this saves me from switching to a terminal or dolphin. The suggested change would further speed up this workflow. I hope this clarifies. Thanks for looking into this. Thanks for the clarification. Merging with an older request. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 267749 *** |