| Summary: | plugins using R2HTML should call require ("R2HTML") | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] rkward | Reporter: | Thomas Friedrichsmeier <thomas.friedrichsmeier> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | RKWard Team <rkward-devel> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | ||
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | unspecified | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Thomas Friedrichsmeier
2005-04-21 13:16:36 UTC
-- Originally posted by (AT sourceforge.net): ecoch -- Logged In: YES user\_id=1131050 For simplicity's sake, though, let's advocate the use of "rk.print\(x\)", which is just like "HTML\(x\)", but with a "require" before. Plugins should use rk.print whenever possible. Anyway, it's better to encapsulate R2HTML, as we might some day want to use something else. Logged In: YES user\_id=300591 Done. Of course output in general is still a major point of inconsistency, and will need much more consideration. That's a separate issue, however. - **status**: open --> closed |