| Summary: | Add a section to recommend hardware to use digiKam | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Info |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | 5.5.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Compiled Sources | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | https://invent.kde.org/documentation/digikam-doc/commit/d3cb4be5a43e5aadfa5c16537aee3f48f3c723f1 | Version Fixed In: | 8.0.0 |
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: | Hardware Profile | ||
Git commit d3cb4be5a43e5aadfa5c16537aee3f48f3c723f1 by Gilles Caulier. Committed on 23/12/2022 at 15:17. Pushed by cgilles into branch 'sphinx'. digiKam handbook 8.0.0 based on Sphinx/ReStructuredText framework: add install and requirements section See new web page used to host next generation of digiKam handbook: https://docs.digikam.org/en/getting_started/installation.html FIXED-IN: 8.0.0 M +1 -0 getting_started.rst A +125 -0 getting_started/installation.rst [INFRASTRUCTURE] M +1 -1 getting_started/introduction.rst M +5 -1 index.rst M +4 -0 setup_application/views_settings.rst https://invent.kde.org/documentation/digikam-doc/commit/d3cb4be5a43e5aadfa5c16537aee3f48f3c723f1 |
Created attachment 105204 [details] Hardware Profile Dear all, since some weeks, I own quite a strong machine, please see attachment. When I start maintaining my images, I still have to wait hours and hours. Under BQM, it still lasts quite long time when dealing with writing writing to database e.g. So I am wondering, if there is a setting for maximum handling speed? Are there recommended settings to use reliable all available CPUs? Is there a test routine to automatically analyse an existing situation and derive optimal settungs? Would be happy if so- Best Axel