| Summary: | Rename LUT3D | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Dmitri Popov <dmpop> |
| Component: | Plugin-Editor-ColorFX | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles, metzpinguin |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 7.1.0 | |
|
Description
Dmitri Popov
2017-04-03 10:27:30 UTC
Which terminology is used in other OpenSource and Commercial applications ? Gilles Caulier I think "Color preset" would be fine. I think the term "color preset" does not do justice to the technology behind LUT3D, it's not just color changes. When I search for screenshots of Photoshop, the term "3D LUT" is also used there. Wikipedia still knows it as a "3D lookup table". Maik (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #3) > I think the term "color preset" does not do justice to the technology behind > LUT3D, it's not just color changes. Good point! How about just "Preset"? The important point is that terms like "3D LUT" and "3D lookup table" are technically correct, but they mean nothing to a regular non-technical user. Darktable : https://www.darktable.org/2019/05/New%20module-lut3d/ ==> "3DLut" PhotoShop : https://filtergrade.com/use-3d-luts-photoshop/ ==> "Color Lockup" ... "3D Lut" And it's the same for all other photo program. So... Gilles Caulier |