Bug 378112

Summary:	No progress bar while maint initializes
Product:	[Applications] digikam	Reporter:	J-o-h-n- <forgivenbyjc>
Component:	ProgressManager-Batch	Assignee:	Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	caulier.gilles, freisim93, metzpinguin
Priority:	NOR
Version:	5.5.0
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	Ubuntu
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:	6.2.0

Description J-o-h-n- 2017-03-26 16:31:20 UTC

Opening digikam5 from the command-line to see output.  When running maintenance on a large number of albums, digikam seems to "hang" either at:
digikam.general: Using  1  CPU core to run threads
or
digikam.general: Creating a fingerprints task for generating fingerprints

Last time this took 00:36:35 for 2635 albums.

There is no feedback on the command-line and no visual feedback (progress bar) in the GUI, also there is no HDD activity nor CPU activity.  I realize digikam is probably doing something, but there is no indication of it.  Is there a cli switch to see more output?

My suggestion would be to include whatever digikam does to initialize maintenance within the progress bar or as a separate task on the progress bar before the intended maintenance-to-be-performed's task.

Too, digikam is sluggish and unresponsive during this initialization process.

Comment 1 Simon 2017-03-27 07:58:29 UTC

Can you describe step by step what you are doing (e.g. what options you choose in the maintenance dialogue).

Comment 2 J-o-h-n- 2017-03-27 15:47:21 UTC

For this specific instance, only fingerprints was selected and scan for changed or non-cataloged items (faster).

Which reminds me of a separate bug, if more than one operation (find new, thumbnails, fingerprints, sync meta, etc) with many albums, then there is a sigfault crash when going from one operation to the next.  I am not certain of the number of albums, probably 200+ or so.  If there is not a bug report about this already, I will figure out more specifics and create one when I have more time.  With a quick search I could not find any bugs, do you know of any by chance?

Comment 3 Simon 2017-03-27 20:57:00 UTC

I can't think of anything from the top of my head. If you can reproduce it while running gdb to get a backtrace, just open a new issue. If it turns out to be a dupe, that wouldn't be a problem.