Summary: | 16-bit files are too bright; Krita should read the TIFFTAG_DCSGAMMA tag | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] krita | Reporter: | sparhawk <kdebugs> |
Component: | File formats | Assignee: | Krita Bugs <krita-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | halla |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 3.1.1 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | https://commits.kde.org/krita/f5a54f8b5f8656a86374438803b2dccdcd67628b | Version Fixed In: | |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
sparhawk
2017-01-23 23:39:27 UTC
Hm, no... I was wrong. That image doesn't contain a gamma tag. No idea where imagemagick gets it from then. Git commit 33ea3d9259fb3ca1345ca2d5efeee788889b9a16 by Boudewijn Rempt. Committed on 24/01/2017 at 09:23. Pushed by rempt into branch 'master'. Related: bug 16 Assume that 16 bit rgb tiff files without a profile are gamma corrected. It would be better for people not to generate these files, or if they did, add the TIFFTAG_DCSGAMMA tag to specify the gamma, but that's unlikely to happen. M +9 -4 plugins/impex/tiff/kis_tiff_converter.cc https://commits.kde.org/krita/33ea3d9259fb3ca1345ca2d5efeee788889b9a16 Git commit f5a54f8b5f8656a86374438803b2dccdcd67628b by Boudewijn Rempt. Committed on 24/01/2017 at 09:23. Pushed by rempt into branch 'krita/3.1'. Related: bug 16 Assume that 16 bit rgb tiff files without a profile are gamma corrected. It would be better for people not to generate these files, or if they did, add the TIFFTAG_DCSGAMMA tag to specify the gamma, but that's unlikely to happen. M +9 -4 plugins/impex/tiff/kis_tiff_converter.cc https://commits.kde.org/krita/f5a54f8b5f8656a86374438803b2dccdcd67628b |