| Summary: | hfsplus-tools commands renamed in some distributions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] partitionmanager | Reporter: | Mattia <mattia.verga> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Andrius Štikonas <andrius> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 2.2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | http://commits.kde.org/kpmcore/aa5daf03786a3eb2a8ca783868f2d2ddd869e1ac | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | |
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Mattia
2016-09-24 15:58:10 UTC
Yeah, I think I'll switch it so symlinks. I also didn't realize that other distributions just rename executables instead of using symlinks. Thanks for the report. Do you think make sense to switch HFS to the same utilities away from hfsutils? Git commit aa5daf03786a3eb2a8ca783868f2d2ddd869e1ac by Andrius Štikonas. Committed on 24/09/2016 at 16:10. Pushed by stikonas into branch 'master'. Use symlinks to hfsplus (diskdev_cmds) commands. Some distributions rename those commands to mkfs.hfsplus and fsck.hfsplus. M +2 -2 src/fs/hfsplus.cpp http://commits.kde.org/kpmcore/aa5daf03786a3eb2a8ca783868f2d2ddd869e1ac (In reply to Andrius Štikonas from comment #2) > Do you think make sense to switch HFS to the same utilities away from > hfsutils? I don't know if hfsplus-tools can handle HFS too. I don't personally use HFS or HFS+. |