| Summary: | Operating System Menu should list "GNU+Linux", not "Linux" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Websites] bugs.kde.org | Reporter: | wil der beest <wilderbeest> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | KDE sysadmins <sysadmin> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | chealer, nate, sheedy |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Kubuntu | ||
| OS: | FreeBSD | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
wil der beest
2016-07-16 15:35:06 UTC
Unlike Linux, GNU is a project, not a product. There is probably no operating system which is composed of all GNU products. For that reason, calling any operating system "GNU+anything" would be misleading. Furthermore, if such a system existed, it would include GNU Hurd, and the name "GNU+Linux" would therefore be incorrect.
At the time where the page you refer to was written, the "GNU+Linux operating system", if there is such a thing, was a lot younger and nowhere near as complete as it is today. I must say I did not use it at that time, but from my understanding, its development must have been a lot more centralized ("cathedral-like") than it is today ("bazaar-like"). In the current state of that operating system, a much higher part of its pieces are not from the GNU project. I arguably use that operating system, in the form of Kubuntu 19.04, with Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Thunderbird. Stating that my system's userland was created by GNU would be exaggeratedly simplified. Very roughly, the userland comes as much from the GNU, KDE, X.org, Qt, Mozilla and LibreOffice projects. And there is probably more that doesn't come from any of these projects than from GNU.
If there is such a thing as that "GNU+Linux operating system", "Linux" is a bad name for it, and "GNU+Linux" is about equally bad. Where I do agree with you is that users should not have to select "Linux" in that drop-down. The 2 Platform dropdowns are currently a mess. Options in both are in large part duplicated (for example, "MS Windows") in both. If I select PCLinuxOS in the first, I shouldn't have to select "Linux" in the second. These fields are in a bad shape and basically need to be re-designed from scratch. First of all, should they be kept? Bugzilla seems to assume an issue affects a single platform, but that is rarely the case. One option is to give up on these fields entirely and just rely on the information in the Description and comments. The report template already includes:
> SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
> Windows:
> macOS:
> Linux/KDE Plasma:
GNU+Linux isn't an OS either. An OS is something like Kubuntu, Arch, or Fedora. This is listed under the "Platform" label which is sufficiently generic. |