| Summary: | unhandled instruction bytes: 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x89 0x6 0xF 0x42 0xC1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Developer tools] valgrind | Reporter: | Oskar <kde> |
| Component: | callgrind | Assignee: | Josef Weidendorfer <josef.weidendorfer> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | crash | CC: | jseward, steve.lorimer |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | 3.11.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
|
Description
Oskar
2016-07-10 16:35:06 UTC
Getting the same error: $ valgrind -v ./dsp/test/dsp_test ==11100== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==11100== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==11100== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info ==11100== Command: ./dsp/test/dsp_test ==11100== --11100-- Valgrind options: --11100-- -v --11100-- Contents of /proc/version: --11100-- Linux version 4.4.0-31-generic (buildd@lgw01-16) (gcc version 5.3.1 20160413 (Ubuntu 5.3.1-14ubuntu2.1) ) #50-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 13 00:07:12 UTC 2016 --11100-- --11100-- Arch and hwcaps: AMD64, LittleEndian, amd64-cx16-lzcnt-rdtscp-sse3-avx-avx2-bmi --11100-- Page sizes: currently 4096, max supported 4096 --11100-- Valgrind library directory: /usr/lib/valgrind --11100-- Reading syms from /home/steve/src/vc/cay/build/dsp/test/dsp_test --11100-- Reading syms from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so --11100-- Considering /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so .. --11100-- .. CRC mismatch (computed d3da0723 wanted a1c29704) --11100-- Considering /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.23.so .. --11100-- .. CRC is valid --11100-- Reading syms from /usr/lib/valgrind/memcheck-amd64-linux --11100-- Considering /usr/lib/valgrind/memcheck-amd64-linux .. --11100-- .. CRC mismatch (computed 5529a2c7 wanted 5bd23904) --11100-- object doesn't have a symbol table --11100-- object doesn't have a dynamic symbol table --11100-- Scheduler: using generic scheduler lock implementation. --11100-- Reading suppressions file: /usr/lib/valgrind/default.supp ==11100== embedded gdbserver: reading from /tmp/vgdb-pipe-from-vgdb-to-11100-by-steve-on-??? ==11100== embedded gdbserver: writing to /tmp/vgdb-pipe-to-vgdb-from-11100-by-steve-on-??? ==11100== embedded gdbserver: shared mem /tmp/vgdb-pipe-shared-mem-vgdb-11100-by-steve-on-??? ==11100== ==11100== TO CONTROL THIS PROCESS USING vgdb (which you probably ==11100== don't want to do, unless you know exactly what you're doing, ==11100== or are doing some strange experiment): ==11100== /usr/lib/valgrind/../../bin/vgdb --pid=11100 ...command... ==11100== ==11100== TO DEBUG THIS PROCESS USING GDB: start GDB like this ==11100== /path/to/gdb ./dsp/test/dsp_test ==11100== and then give GDB the following command ==11100== target remote | /usr/lib/valgrind/../../bin/vgdb --pid=11100 ==11100== --pid is optional if only one valgrind process is running ==11100== --11100-- REDIR: 0x401cdc0 (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2:strlen) redirected to 0x3809e181 (???) --11100-- Reading syms from /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_core-amd64-linux.so --11100-- Considering /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_core-amd64-linux.so .. --11100-- .. CRC mismatch (computed a30c8eaa wanted 7ae2fed4) --11100-- object doesn't have a symbol table --11100-- Reading syms from /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so --11100-- Considering /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so .. --11100-- .. CRC mismatch (computed 402c2ab5 wanted 745f25ae) --11100-- object doesn't have a symbol table ==11100== WARNING: new redirection conflicts with existing -- ignoring it --11100-- old: 0x0401cdc0 (strlen ) R-> (0000.0) 0x3809e181 ??? --11100-- new: 0x0401cdc0 (strlen ) R-> (2007.0) 0x04c31020 strlen --11100-- REDIR: 0x401b710 (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2:index) redirected to 0x4c30bc0 (index) --11100-- REDIR: 0x401b930 (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2:strcmp) redirected to 0x4c320d0 (strcmp) --11100-- REDIR: 0x401db20 (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2:mempcpy) redirected to 0x4c35270 (mempcpy) --11100-- Reading syms from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21 --11100-- Considering /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21 .. --11100-- .. CRC mismatch (computed 6d893738 wanted d420bd97) --11100-- object doesn't have a symbol table --11100-- Reading syms from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm-2.23.so --11100-- Considering /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm-2.23.so .. --11100-- .. CRC mismatch (computed f7791cb7 wanted 92acf4be) --11100-- Considering /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm-2.23.so .. --11100-- .. CRC is valid --11100-- Reading syms from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 --11100-- Considering /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 .. --11100-- .. CRC mismatch (computed b9a68419 wanted 29d51b00) --11100-- object doesn't have a symbol table --11100-- Reading syms from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread-2.23.so --11100-- Considering /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/b7/7847cc9cacbca3b5753d0d25a32e5795afe75b.debug .. --11100-- .. build-id is valid --11100-- Reading syms from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.23.so --11100-- Considering /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.23.so .. --11100-- .. CRC mismatch (computed 2adb2e50 wanted 9b73f606) --11100-- Considering /usr/lib/debug/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.23.so .. --11100-- .. CRC is valid --11100-- REDIR: 0x5986fd0 (libc.so.6:strcasecmp) redirected to 0x4a286f0 (_vgnU_ifunc_wrapper) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5982850 (libc.so.6:strcspn) redirected to 0x4a286f0 (_vgnU_ifunc_wrapper) --11100-- REDIR: 0x59892c0 (libc.so.6:strncasecmp) redirected to 0x4a286f0 (_vgnU_ifunc_wrapper) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5984cc0 (libc.so.6:strpbrk) redirected to 0x4a286f0 (_vgnU_ifunc_wrapper) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5985050 (libc.so.6:strspn) redirected to 0x4a286f0 (_vgnU_ifunc_wrapper) --11100-- REDIR: 0x598671b (libc.so.6:memcpy@GLIBC_2.2.5) redirected to 0x4a286f0 (_vgnU_ifunc_wrapper) --11100-- REDIR: 0x59849d0 (libc.so.6:rindex) redirected to 0x4c308a0 (rindex) --11100-- REDIR: 0x597b550 (libc.so.6:malloc) redirected to 0x4c2db20 (malloc) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5982cf0 (libc.so.6:strlen) redirected to 0x4c30f60 (strlen) --11100-- REDIR: 0x59861c0 (libc.so.6:__GI_memcmp) redirected to 0x4c33b90 (__GI_memcmp) --11100-- REDIR: 0x59812a0 (libc.so.6:strcmp) redirected to 0x4a286f0 (_vgnU_ifunc_wrapper) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5996b40 (libc.so.6:__strcmp_sse2_unaligned) redirected to 0x4c31f90 (strcmp) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5983140 (libc.so.6:__GI_strncmp) redirected to 0x4c31710 (__GI_strncmp) --11100-- REDIR: 0x598b9c0 (libc.so.6:memcpy@@GLIBC_2.14) redirected to 0x4a286f0 (_vgnU_ifunc_wrapper) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5a456d0 (libc.so.6:__memcpy_avx_unaligned) redirected to 0x4c324a0 (memcpy@@GLIBC_2.14) --11100-- REDIR: 0x4ec7e60 (libstdc++.so.6:operator new(unsigned long)) redirected to 0x4c2e080 (operator new(unsigned long)) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5986180 (libc.so.6:bcmp) redirected to 0x4a286f0 (_vgnU_ifunc_wrapper) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5a65c60 (libc.so.6:__memcmp_sse4_1) redirected to 0x4c33cd0 (__memcmp_sse4_1) --11100-- REDIR: 0x597c290 (libc.so.6:calloc) redirected to 0x4c2faa0 (calloc) --11100-- REDIR: 0x4ec5f10 (libstdc++.so.6:operator delete(void*)) redirected to 0x4c2f1e0 (operator delete(void*)) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5a451e0 (libc.so.6:__memmove_avx_unaligned) redirected to 0x4c32230 (memcpy@GLIBC_2.2.5) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5986780 (libc.so.6:memset) redirected to 0x4a286f0 (_vgnU_ifunc_wrapper) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5a6a1a0 (libc.so.6:__memset_avx2) redirected to 0x4c344c0 (memset) --11100-- REDIR: 0x4ec7f10 (libstdc++.so.6:operator new[](unsigned long)) redirected to 0x4c2e7a0 (operator new[](unsigned long)) --11100-- REDIR: 0x4ec5f40 (libstdc++.so.6:operator delete[](void*)) redirected to 0x4c2f6e0 (operator delete[](void*)) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5985e30 (libc.so.6:memchr) redirected to 0x4c32170 (memchr) --11100-- REDIR: 0x598ba40 (libc.so.6:__GI_memcpy) redirected to 0x4c32b00 (__GI_memcpy) --11100-- REDIR: 0x597ba70 (libc.so.6:free) redirected to 0x4c2ed80 (free) --11100-- REDIR: 0x598dd30 (libc.so.6:strchrnul) redirected to 0x4c34da0 (strchrnul) --11100-- REDIR: 0x598db20 (libc.so.6:rawmemchr) redirected to 0x4c34dd0 (rawmemchr) --11100-- REDIR: 0x5986980 (libc.so.6:__GI_mempcpy) redirected to 0x4c34fa0 (__GI_mempcpy) Running 9 test cases... vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x89 0x6 0xF 0x42 0xC1 vex amd64->IR: REX=0 REX.W=0 REX.R=0 REX.X=0 REX.B=0 vex amd64->IR: VEX=0 VEX.L=0 VEX.nVVVV=0x0 ESC=0F vex amd64->IR: PFX.66=0 PFX.F2=0 PFX.F3=0 ==11100== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x4ef1b15. ==11100== at 0x4EF1B15: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21) ==11100== by 0x4EF1CB1: std::random_device::_M_getval() (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21) ==11100== by 0x602627: std::random_device::operator()() (random.h:1612) ==11100== by 0x60326C: cay::StatsFixture::StatsFixture() (dsp_tests.cpp:21) ==11100== by 0x603403: mean_test::mean_test() (dsp_tests.cpp:43) ==11100== by 0x5F9FEB: mean_test_invoker() (dsp_tests.cpp:43) ==11100== by 0x60994E: boost::detail::function::void_function_invoker0<void (*)(), void>::invoke(boost::detail::function::function_buffer&) (function_template.hpp:118) ==11100== by 0x5B4D8C: boost::function0<void>::operator()() const (function_template.hpp:771) ==11100== by 0x5AB13C: boost::detail::forward::operator()() (execution_monitor.ipp:1306) ==11100== by 0x5DD424: boost::detail::function::function_obj_invoker0<boost::detail::forward, int>::invoke(boost::detail::function::function_buffer&) (function_template.hpp:138) ==11100== by 0x5C8390: boost::function0<int>::operator()() const (function_template.hpp:771) ==11100== by 0x5B9A76: int boost::detail::do_invoke<boost::shared_ptr<boost::detail::translator_holder_base>, boost::function<int ()> >(boost::shared_ptr<boost::detail::translator_holder_base> const&, boost::function<int ()> const&) (execution_monitor.ipp:281) ==11100== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind ==11100== did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this. ==11100== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code ==11100== location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a ==11100== warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault. ==11100== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it, ==11100== i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or ==11100== you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it. ==11100== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will ==11100== probably kill your program. ==11100== Warning: client switching stacks? SP change: 0x5d48008 --> 0xffeffe670 ==11100== to suppress, use: --max-stackframe=68604880488 or greater unknown location(0): fatal error: in "mean_test": signal: illegal opcode; address of failing instruction: 0x04ef1b15 /home/steve/src/vc/cay/dsp/test/dsp_tests.cpp(43): last checkpoint: "mean_test" fixture entry. *** 1 failure is detected in the test module "Master Test Suite" ==11100== ==11100== HEAP SUMMARY: ==11100== in use at exit: 72,744 bytes in 2 blocks ==11100== total heap usage: 3,631 allocs, 3,629 frees, 309,688 bytes allocated ==11100== ==11100== Searching for pointers to 2 not-freed blocks ==11100== Checked 152,632 bytes ==11100== ==11100== LEAK SUMMARY: ==11100== definitely lost: 40 bytes in 1 blocks ==11100== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==11100== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==11100== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==11100== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==11100== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory ==11100== ==11100== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ==11100== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) I think this is almost certainly the same underlying cause as with bug 353370, which has been fixed. So I'll close this, as a dup of 353370. Could you re-try the trunk? That should work. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 353370 *** |