| Summary: | [Openconnect] Cannot connect to OpenConnect VPN with username/password | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Plasma] plasmashell | Reporter: | Joe <jchevarley> |
| Component: | Networks widget | Assignee: | Jan Grulich <jgrulich> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | jgrulich, lukas |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | master | ||
| Target Milestone: | 1.0 | ||
| Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Joe
2016-05-06 02:22:26 UTC
I'm not able to reproduce this issue. I tried to setup an ocserver with plain user/password authentication and it works just fine. I guess that what you see in the log could be the reason why it doesn't work for you and I think that the problem is in the server you are trying to connect to. It works just fine using the command line openconnect tool, though, which would make me think its not the server. I believe the no auth return is from the fact that the username/password dialog never appears, and thus it always sends the connection request with no authentication particulars. Provide please information requested here: https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Solid/Plasma-nm#Plasma-nm_doesn.27t_remember_my_password So, I think this actually might be a misunderstanding. I use openconnect on the command line, but with the --juniper switch. Digging around a bit more, I want to say that the plasma nm applet doesn't actually support juniper yet - is that correct? Perhaps this should be more of a feature request issue. The support for Openconnect Juniper has been added to Plasma/5.8 (I think). There should be a new entry in the connection editor for that. Meant to update/comment - looks like it isn't in 5.8 - maybe its something for 5.9? Hm, I didn't realize it was pushed to master only so it will be released with Plasma 5.9, see bug 363917. Ah, perfect appreciate it, for some reason I couldn't find a bug for it existing (although I did see something about it in the mailing lists). Thanks! So that bug didn't fix this issue for me, but, 380399 finally has, which is awesome. Bulk transfer as requested in T17796 |