Summary: | When importing picture file dates are all from importing time. Not creation date | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Jo Scheuchenpflug <schjo> |
Component: | Import-MainView | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | metzpinguin |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 4.14.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | openSUSE | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | http://commits.kde.org/digikam/16dc3a9b055931dbb84a2d29f3a0a901bebbc812 | Version Fixed In: | 5.0.0 |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Jo Scheuchenpflug
2016-03-27 17:44:01 UTC
RAW or JPEG files? The modification date is correctly for RAW files. We write the document name in the EXIF for JPEG files or by activated automatic rotation, fix internal date / time and rating or color / pick label change, is the modification date from file changed to the current date. I think we should write the document name optional in the EXIF. If all JPEG operations are disabled, the modification date is unchanged and the file is unchanged. Maik My camera just supports jpeg files. so no idea whether different behavior with raw images. I cannot follow your sentence "we write .... current date". What do you want to tell me? what do you mean by document name? is it the file name? concerning jpeg operations: I do not modify the files in any way at import time. even no copyright entry. To make it clear: I would like to have the date and time given to the imported picture file the same as the date and timestamp when the picture has been taken. Otherwise sorting by date (especially if several cameras took pictures (and film sequences!) at an event cannot be done reliable. And I have checked now closer: beginning 01.10.2015 digikam started to have a different behavior. Previous to that date (digikam 4.6.0 as stated in EXIF Information under Processing Software) all the files got the time stamp of the shooting time. Unfortunately there is a time area where following images do not have the Processing Software entry. (another bug?). Latest images are correct again concerning the Processing Software value. Git commit 16dc3a9b055931dbb84a2d29f3a0a901bebbc812 by Maik Qualmann. Committed on 28/03/2016 at 11:08. Pushed by mqualmann into branch 'master'. write document name to EXIF is configurable now FIXED-IN: 5.0.0 M +2 -1 NEWS M +22 -6 utilities/importui/backend/cameracontroller.cpp M +8 -6 utilities/importui/backend/downloadsettings.h M +9 -0 utilities/importui/widgets/advancedsettings.cpp http://commits.kde.org/digikam/16dc3a9b055931dbb84a2d29f3a0a901bebbc812 if all JPEG options disabled now, the file is after impor not modified and the modification date remains. Maik what repository do I need to add to get the 5.0.0 release right now? Thanks a lot Johannes DigiKam5 is not yet released, is currently beta-5. See release plan: https://www.digikam.org/about/releaseplan Currently you must compile it from the sources themselves. Maik |