Summary: | Very confusing and hard to navigate long list of products when searching or filing/creating tickets | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Websites] bugs.kde.org | Reporter: | hvm <hvm2hvm> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | KDE sysadmins <sysadmin> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | chealer, sheedy, taurnil.oronar |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
hvm
2016-03-11 07:31:38 UTC
(In reply to hvm from comment #0) > When filing for a bug, the list of products is pretty confusing. I have a > hard time finding the name of a product when I know it let alone when I'm > not sure which is it. > > The about pages of the applications are not always helpful with this either. > > It would help a lot if there would be more information in the dropdown - > official name of the app/product, not just the internal name, version kde it > was present in (kde4/kde5, plasma whatever, etc) and searching through all > of these. > > Thanks! > Voicu Meant to say, when searching for a bug, i.e. on https://bugs.kde.org/query.cgi I very much agree with this. With the power JavaScript and the web platform has reached, there should really be a text field to dynamically filter through products, or - even better - the select multiple should be replaced with a fancy drop-down like those allowed by the Chosen jQuery plugin. This will probably be more complicated since components need to be considered too. Ideally, there would be a single text field where I'd type for example "korgac". If korgac is defined as a product, then that product would come up as the first suggestion. If korgac is instead defined as a component of the korganizer product, then that component would come up as the first suggestion. I think it would make sense, before attacking this issue, to reconsider the structure of products and components. Many products are small and have a single "general" component. Other products are big and have so many components that some are related; for example, amarok has components "Playback", "Playback/CUE sheet support", "Playback/Replay Gain", "Playback/Streams". Therefore, for a small product like abakus, a single-level categorization system would be better, while for a big product like amarok, a three-level categorization system would be better. So I think it would be best to allow a variable depth. A product could have sub-products, and any sub-product may have sub-sub-products. With this approach, we could put all products/components in a single widget which would ease filtering. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 340420 *** hvm, I hope you don't mind, but as this issue affects both ticket search and creation, and as you mentioned creation in your original Description, I am re-titling this ticket so the scope clearly includes filing tickets. *** Bug 213244 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |