Summary: | unauthorized device autoconnects | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Unmaintained] Bluedevil | Reporter: | arne anka <kde-bugs> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | David Rosca <nowrep> |
Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
Severity: | critical | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version First Reported In: | 5.4.3 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
arne anka
2016-01-29 22:37:23 UTC
The device is shown as connected when pairing process is in progress, because in fact it is. But it does not mean it is connected to some profile, which would allow it to do anything. Bluedevil does not automatically accepts pairing requests, so if you didn't accept the PIN (which seems you didn't), there is nothing to worry about. Also, if you don't catch the notification and it timeouts, the pairing request is automatically cancelled. And one last thing, the only thing you can do is to set your adapter to Hidden. There is no other way to stop other devices initiate pairing with your adapter. i see, thanks for the info. but maybe to show a dedicated name for that pairing phase, different from "connected" would be helpful? (In reply to arne anka from comment #3) > but maybe to show a dedicated name for that pairing phase, different from > "connected" would be helpful? But there is no way to distinguish it, BlueZ just reports connected. but according to the log snippet, the pairing request is handled through bluedevil -- wouldn't it be possible to use that as a distinguishing feature? incoming/pending pairing request of unknown device -> "pairing requested" denied -> "pairing denied" (if it takes longer to disconnect again/update the listing) accepted -> as is Sorry but no, it would be only guessing. |