| Summary: | Krita Animation Beta - Moving First Frame Leaves Behind Blank Frame Instead of Empty | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] krita | Reporter: | sayantan.chaudhuri+kde |
| Component: | Animation | Assignee: | Krita Bugs <krita-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED LATER | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | dimula73, halla |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 2.9.10 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
sayantan.chaudhuri+kde
2015-12-12 04:37:47 UTC
Added to https://phabricator.kde.org/T1141 Hi, Sayantan! It is done intentionally that the zero frame is present on the timeline. We will be able to hide it only after 3.0. What exactly is your problem, that the frame is seen on the timeline or that the frame has some opaque content after being deleted? Hullo Dmitry. Now that I think about it, I see how the first frame can indeed be tricky! In my case, the problem is indeed that an opaque/blank frame interrupts my loop that was otherwise flowing seamlessly before moving that one frame. But then, the end frame would not have "held" to the first frame anyway, so I shouldn't've expected that. I am convinced that I can personally work with an extra step of alt-dragging the animation a few steps back after moving the first frame. At least until 3.0! :D Shall I mark this issue as resolved, or will this be as-intended or won't-fix? I can't mark those status tags as a submitter, right? I'll mark this bug as LATER. We will probably fix it after 3.0 release. |