Summary: | wrong font interpretation with oxygen-sans | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Unmaintained] kde-gtk-config | Reporter: | Roberto Secchi <roby.secchi> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Manuel Tortosa <manutortosa> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | major | CC: | aleixpol |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version First Reported In: | 5.4.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Kubuntu | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Roberto Secchi
2015-11-04 15:08:31 UTC
It could be a bug on the font? It looks like it's doing what it's supposed to do.. Hi Aleix thank's for you reply, I think that is a bug related betweek translation and kde-gtk module. If I use italian lenguage the font in the selaction is expressed with: Segoe UI Normale 10 and in the gtk module, after I force the font for gtk app, writite the gtk-2.0 file in this mode: Segoe UI Normnale 10 But the system recognize it with Segoe UI Normal 10, so all gtk app fallback to sans-serif. Like above, the family oxygen-sans in the same way , but here the problem is agan the transcription of font: oxygen-sans sans-book is not recognized in favour of sans serif standar font family. If I change sans-book in "normal", all gtk app recognize it. I think that now the problem probably is not the gtk module, but related about font, or with gtk2.0 that is not able to read sans-book, but why with segoe ui there is a translation in different lenguage ? I'm not able to debug so deeply. If you all think that I have to submit this bug to oxygen-sans developers, sure I'll do. I'm not aware of translation issues on font names. Maybe you could investigate what's going on? Or give me something to read on the subject? I'm not sure how to proceed TBH. I think that with segoe family is a problem related with the settings in the language of my distro, so you should not consider this. I'll investigate on the oxygen-sans family and related. found, this is the problem that I have, well speacked. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343561 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 343561 *** It doesn't really say much further... thanks Aleix ;) |