Summary: | wrong calculated size of direcories | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Frameworks and Libraries] frameworks-kio | Reporter: | Bozhan Boyadzhiev <bozhan> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | David Faure <faure> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | aoudelet, avinashrocks1990, bugseforuns, chinmoyrp65, claudius.ellsel, emmanuelpescosta099, kdelibs-bugs, nate |
Priority: | NOR | Keywords: | usability |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Debian testing | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Attachments: | calculated size is bigger than file system size |
Description
Bozhan Boyadzhiev
2015-10-01 06:43:28 UTC
Created attachment 94789 [details]
calculated size is bigger than file system size
Thanks for the bug report, I can reproduce the problem here. /proc has 128 TiB ;) I'll reassign it to KIO, because all the code for the size calculation is there. du /proc 0 /proc/ *** Bug 364249 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 428142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 429781 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Looks a bit like 128 TiB is used as starting value when the size is calculated. Duplicate, really. Annoying. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 423057 *** Hm, usually I'd expect the oldest bug to be the original one (in this case it seems https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298133 is the one) and then all newer bugs to be marked as duplicates of that one. Is there a reason not to handle it this way here? (In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #9) > Hm, usually I'd expect the oldest bug to be the original one (in this case > it seems https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298133 is the one) and then > all newer bugs to be marked as duplicates of that one. Is there a reason not > to handle it this way here? Right. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 298133 *** Thanks btw. for finding the duplicates and triaging them! |