| Summary: | digikam title vs. gwenview headline | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] gwenview | Reporter: | Knut Hildebrandt <post> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Gwenview Bugs <gwenview-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | alan.pater, justin.zobel, myriam |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Chakra | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Knut Hildebrandt
2015-03-27 20:25:06 UTC
Strange behaviour, but a couple of points. 1) To view rather then edit the Title, just use the sidebar. View > Sidebar > Information tab on the bottom. Then click the More link to specify what tags or properties you want displayed. 2) Plugins/Image/Edit All Metadata actually takes you to the Kipi-MetadataEdit plugin, same as in Digikam. Normally this would used for editing rather then viewing any tags and properties. But it seems to be disabled in Gwenview. All fields on all tabs are greyed out and one cannot navigate the different categories. That's likely a different bug then simply viewing the Title. A bit of further research indicates that when the MetadataEdit plugin has everything greyed out, it is due to a library version conflict between gwenview and kipi-plugins. In my case, I have updated kipi-plugins but not gwenview. I almost had forgotten about this bug report. Meanwhile I would mark it "solved" even though the "solution" is quite strange. I had expected to find the Title under Content in gwenview. Since there is no Title field but only one for Headline I assumed this to be the one in question. That's wrong. If you click Status you will find the Title field which holds either the value of Xmp.dc.title for XMP values or Iptc.Application2.ObjectName in case of IPTC. The only think that makes me wonder, why is the Title hidden under Status and not displayed under Content, where I would expect it. I wish all applications would just follow Metadata Working Group guidelines and organize everything under Who, What, Where, When. Many people don't want to know or care about the differences between EXIF, IPTC and XMP. Digikam mostly follows MWG guidelines, it looks like the kipi MetadataEditor and Gwenview have not caught up yet. |