| Summary: | valgrind --leak-check=full memleak errors from system libraries in OS X 10.10.2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Developer tools] valgrind | Reporter: | jhi |
| Component: | memcheck | Assignee: | Julian Seward <jseward> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | mark, rhyskidd |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | MacPorts | ||
| OS: | macOS | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: |
log from "valgrind --leak-check=full ./zero"
valgrind suppressions file |
||
|
Description
jhi
2015-02-25 00:12:05 UTC
Created attachment 91281 [details]
log from "valgrind --leak-check=full ./zero"
Created attachment 91282 [details]
valgrind suppressions file
This appears to be a duplicate of bz#344702. Resolved in r14972. Can you please confirm SVN versions resolve the issue for you? > This appears to be a duplicate of bz#344702. Resolved in r14972. > > Can you please confirm SVN versions resolve the issue for you? I have been using the MacPorts versions of valgrind, I will need to ask the maintainers to pull and build that new version. On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:22 AM, <rhyskidd@gmail.com> wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344543 > > --- Comment #3 from rhyskidd@gmail.com --- > This appears to be a duplicate of bz#344702. Resolved in r14972. > > Can you please confirm SVN versions resolve the issue for you? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. Ping. Can this be closed as a dup, or is it still alive? On Tuesday-201504-28 6:50, Julian Seward wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344543 > > --- Comment #5 from Julian Seward <jseward@acm.org> --- > Ping. Can this be closed as a dup, or is it still alive? All I can do is to re-ping the macports people, I will do that right now. AFAICT the macports valgind-devel is based on r14960: sudo port installed | grep valgrind-devel valgrind-devel @3.11.0-r14960_0 (active) so not quite r14972. Confirming this is a dup and has been resolved. jhi will need to follow up the macports team to pull a more current development version:
$ cat ../zero.c
int main() { return 0; }
$ ./vg-in-place ../zero
==90288== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==90288== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==90288== Using Valgrind-3.11.0.SVN and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==90288== Command: ../zero
==90288==
==90288==
==90288== HEAP SUMMARY:
==90288== in use at exit: 34,717 bytes in 426 blocks
==90288== total heap usage: 502 allocs, 76 frees, 40,741 bytes allocated
==90288==
==90288== LEAK SUMMARY:
==90288== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==90288== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==90288== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==90288== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==90288== suppressed: 34,717 bytes in 426 blocks
==90288==
==90288== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==90288== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
$ ./vg-in-place --leak-check=full ../zero
==90291== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==90291== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==90291== Using Valgrind-3.11.0.SVN and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==90291== Command: ../zero
==90291==
==90291==
==90291== HEAP SUMMARY:
==90291== in use at exit: 34,717 bytes in 426 blocks
==90291== total heap usage: 502 allocs, 76 frees, 40,741 bytes allocated
==90291==
==90291== LEAK SUMMARY:
==90291== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==90291== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==90291== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==90291== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==90291== suppressed: 34,717 bytes in 426 blocks
==90291==
==90291== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==90291== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 15 from 15)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 344702 *** |