Summary: | How to enable face recognition is hard to detect in settings dialogue | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] kphotoalbum | Reporter: | Andreas Schleth <schleth_es> |
Component: | Annotation Dialog | Assignee: | Johannes Zarl-Zierl <johannes> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | johannes, tl |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | GIT master | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: | |||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 342457 |
Description
Andreas Schleth
2014-12-27 16:14:47 UTC
For new databases, positionable tags are enabled for the category "People" by default, but I agree that the wording could be better. "enable face recognition for this category" or something similar is not quite right, since positionable tags can be used without face recognition. Git commit b38577dc758a5b47722fe3aac9b95dce443fcefb by Johannes Zarl. Committed on 31/12/2014 at 16:29. Pushed by johanneszarl into branch 'master'. Better wording in settings-text on positionable tags. M +1 -1 Settings/CategoryPage.cpp http://commits.kde.org/kphotoalbum/b38577dc758a5b47722fe3aac9b95dce443fcefb I like the new text much better. Probably, we should leave the button enabled, even if there's no "positionable" category and simply display a warning like "To be able to use face detection, please enable 'Tags in this category can be associated with an area of the image' for at least one category in the settings dialog". The description of the option is now better, but perhaps, the relation between a category that "can be associated with an area of the image" and face detection is still not obvious? @Andreas: Thanks for filing this bug! It's true that if you implement stuff yourself, you don't see such pitfalls ;-) Git commit da31ab41c02036a4e1e59d03f137685d4f063602 by Johannes Zarl. Committed on 01/01/2015 at 15:41. Pushed by johanneszarl into branch 'master'. Add hints on how to enable positionable tags if disabled. M +39 -10 AnnotationDialog/ImagePreviewWidget.cpp M +4 -0 AnnotationDialog/ImagePreviewWidget.h http://commits.kde.org/kphotoalbum/da31ab41c02036a4e1e59d03f137685d4f063602 I think it's more clear now … so can we close this one? Well, nobody ever complained again about this, so I'll close it now ;-) |