Summary: | Okular crashes when opening epub document | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] okular | Reporter: | Robert Dinah <rhdinah> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Robert Dinah <rhdinah> |
Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
Severity: | crash | CC: | j.solanki17, yurchor |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 0.15.5 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Attachments: | User Guide by Sony Corporation |
Description
Robert Dinah
2013-07-22 18:26:55 UTC
Please attach the epub file Also, which libepub are you using? Created attachment 81278 [details]
User Guide by Sony Corporation
Please attach the epub file --> Done
Also, which libepub are you using? --> The one provided by Ubuntu 12.10
"The one provided by Ubuntu 12.10" is not an answer, please give us a version number. ""The one provided by Ubuntu 12.10" is not an answer, please give us a version number." What kind of unprofessional, rude remark are you making to me? Who do you think you are? Why is it not an answer? It most definititely is an answer to the question: "Also, which libepub are you using?" Do you think I'm going to pull the version number out of a hat? Rather than giving a smart aleck smack in the face to a user ... it would rather be more polite, professional AND ADULT to tell me where and how to get the information you need in the first place. Consider yourself fortunate I went to the bother to even report this. I'm trying to do you a favour and improve the product. Instead you throw smart aleck remarks. You should be ashamed of yourself. (In reply to comment #4) > ""The one provided by Ubuntu 12.10" is not an answer, please give us a > version number." > > What kind of unprofessional, rude remark are you making to me? Who do you > think you are? Why is it not an answer? It most definititely is an answer to > the question: "Also, which libepub are you using?" Do you think I'm going to > pull the version number out of a hat? Sorry, but Ubuntu is not the only one distribution with just one version. Moreover, "Ubuntu 12.10"-version can be anything from this list for QQ (at least 2 versions): https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/okular it can be something from backports, it can be something from PPA. So the remark was very professional, concise and direct. > Rather than giving a smart aleck smack in the face to a user ... it would > rather be more polite, professional AND ADULT to tell me where and how to > get the information you need in the first place. Consider yourself fortunate > I went to the bother to even report this. I'm trying to do you a favour and > improve the product. Instead you throw smart aleck remarks. You should be > ashamed of yourself. Please start your package manager (it is not very hard to do) and spend some 20 seconds of your precious time by typing "okular", then remembering the version and "libepub" and remembering the version. Then just copy and paste version numbers here. Thanks in advance for your hard work. Another wise guy? "and spend some 20 seconds of your precious time" ... Why should I bother with this ... in fact I won't ... keep your bug ... you have the file ... now spend some of your precious time and open the debugger ... and figure it out ... or don't ... This file does not crash Okular 0.17.60 with libepub 0.2.2 in Mageia 3 (x86-64). Robert, updating libepub will fix this. This bug was fixed some time ago. http://sourceforge.net/p/ebook-tools/code/145/ no need to even comment on this Thank you jaydeep for your respectful reply. It would be nice if your other team members would respect and not speak down to those who are trying to help you out. If someone in my company spoke to a customer who was reporting a bug in that tone of voice, he/she would be out in the street the same day. Thanks again jaydeep. |