Summary: | Symbolic integration | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Frameworks and Libraries] analitza | Reporter: | Percy Camilo Triveño Aucahuasi <percy.camilo.ta> |
Component: | core | Assignee: | Aleix Pol <aleixpol> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | wishlist | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Percy Camilo Triveño Aucahuasi
2013-05-10 04:57:32 UTC
You talk about some constraints but I can't see them. Hi Alex, Constrains like: Only for simple functions (basic rules): f(x)=ax+b f(x)=sin(ax+b),cos(ax+b),tan,... trigonometric functions f(x)=ln(ax+b) f(x)=exp(ax+b) f(x)=power(g(x), n), where g(x) is one of previous functions. f(x)=linear combination of previous functions; I mean just multiply each function by a constant and sum all the functions For those cases we can have the antiderivatives and even the definite integrals, so the command can be like: integral(f(x),x) give us the antiderivative integral(f(x),x,0,5) give use a number So the integral command would take this args: f: function var: equivalent to dx, is the variable with respect the integral can be performed and 2 optional args to computed numeric (or symbolic too) result: from: a number or a symbol to: a number or a symbol For example if we write: integral(f(x),x,0,t) then this give us an expression like F(t) where t is a symbolic var (var from varsmodule ;)) If you need more ideas, please tell me what can I help, I'm sure that if this feature will be implemented then it needs to do step by step. Percy :) Thank you for the bug report. As this report hasn't seen any changes in 5 years or more, we ask if you can please confirm that the issue still persists. If this bug is no longer persisting or relevant please change the status to resolved. |