Bug 317669

Summary:	Two dialogs when overwrite alert.
Product:	[Applications] digikam	Reporter:	Marek Potocki <qrczakoff>
Component:	AdvancedRename-dialog	Assignee:	Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	caulier.gilles
Priority:	NOR
Version First Reported In:	3.1.0
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	openSUSE
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed/Implemented In:	4.0.0
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments:	Twice displayed digikam overwrite alert

Description Marek Potocki 2013-04-01 07:08:49 UTC

On change file name to existing, window with alert opening twice.
Bug happens always in my file naming system, but when I test another configurations, it's not happens always.
My file naming system: 
1. RAW file (.CR2 or .ARW)   
2. JPEG file (.JPG)
1+2 with xmp metadata files and groupped

Reproducible: Sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create files with my schema ex. FOO.CR2 and FOO.JPG (I thing group is not obligatory).
2. Generate with external program file with same base name, but with lowercase extension (FOO.jpg).
3. Rename FOO.jpg to FOO.JPG

Comment 1 Marek Potocki 2013-04-01 07:09:45 UTC

Created attachment 78533 [details]
Twice displayed digikam overwrite alert

Comment 2 caulier.gilles 2013-04-01 07:19:27 UTC

Which digiKam version do you use ?

Gilles Caulier

Comment 3 Marek Potocki 2013-04-01 08:33:38 UTC

3.1.0, but 3.0.x versions have same problem


2013/4/1 Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com>

> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317669
>
> Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |caulier.gilles@gmail.com
>
> --- Comment #2 from Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles@gmail.com> ---
> Which digiKam version do you use ?
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.
>

Comment 4 caulier.gilles 2013-12-04 17:58:07 UTC

MArek, 

This file still valid using digiKam 3.5.0 ?

Gilles Caulier

Comment 5 Marek Potocki 2013-12-04 18:12:30 UTC

In 3.5.0 it's fixed. Thanks.