Summary: | drkonqi hangs indefinately while sending crash report | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] drkonqi | Reporter: | kdebugs.anon134 |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Unassigned bugs mailing-list <unassigned-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | adaptee, mail, martin.ruessler, richard.llom |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 2.1.5 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | openSUSE | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | http://commits.kde.org/kde-runtime/b5a8845c515fa6f6b40d58748f05b626d2356f17 | Version Fixed In: | 4.10.2 |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
kdebugs.anon134
2013-03-18 10:24:34 UTC
I'm impressed by this detailed report, but frankly I have no idea why it stucks. I can only routinely blame the network connection or some temporary bugs.kde.org high load problem , since drkonqi works well in sending crash information to bugs.kde.org as usual, which can be observed and confirmed by querying crash reports created recently. By the way, the query shows that you have added (basically the same) crash information onto bug 308823 for 7~8 times today. Please don't do that in the future: 1. Adding the same information multiple times does not provide extra help, but only create noise. Once is good enough. 2. bug 308823 is already marked as duplicate of bug 258505, so you should follow the suggestion of drkonqi (it should have) and add your crash information onto bug 258505 instead of bug 308823. Actually, your own activities today show that drkonqi works well for you. I added multiple crash reports becuase I was not aware the reports were being sent, as it appeared that drkonqi was not finishing the job. I did not intentionally send multiple copies of the same report, nor would I in the future. From now on, when drkonqi appears to be hanging (as it is again now), I will check https://bugs.kde.org before I submit the same report again. Hello Jekyll Wu, I added my bug report from above to bug 258505 as you suggested. Hello, I have the very same problem, my report from bug 317137: Up to the final upload page, everything works fine in DrKonqi: debugging, looking for bugs/duplicates (which is AWESOME btw, thanks a lot for this!!!), etc. However, on the final upload page it starts uploading the report, but never finishes. DrKonqi is still running, so you can just cancel and end drkonqi. On the bug report, the attachment is fully uploaded and there is also comment which is however stripped (i.e. not fully uploaded). I had this now two times where I attached my report to an existing bug: bug 315649 comment #7 bug 297502 comment #17 Reproducible: Always -- Strange that I didn't found this report while reporting mine... Also looking at other DrKonqi reports/comments we don't seem to be the only ones. *** Bug 317137 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Git commit b5a8845c515fa6f6b40d58748f05b626d2356f17 by Jekyll Wu. Committed on 25/03/2013 at 04:53. Pushed by jekyllwu into branch 'KDE/4.10'. Connect to the new signal, instead of the non-existent one I made a stupid mistake in the final revised patch for review 108411, which makes drkonqi never realize the attachment has been successfully uploaded to the bugzilla. FIXED-IN: 4.10.2 M +1 -1 drkonqi/reportinterface.cpp http://commits.kde.org/kde-runtime/b5a8845c515fa6f6b40d58748f05b626d2356f17 Really sorry for this stupid mistake. (In reply to comment #7) > Really sorry for this stupid mistake. Anyway, thank you that you took a look at it and fixed it so fast! Maybe this could be posted to planetkde.org or on the KDE page as information. (In reply to comment #9) > Maybe this could be posted to planetkde.org or on the KDE page as > information. You mean to blame Jekyll ;-) or to inform the users? I guess you mean for the latter... Well, there must be /quite/ a few users affected by this, but only very few find its way to bko, so I guess it just doesn't matter that much. Also there would be (IMHO) very little information content in this message: "Well, we had an regression 4.10.1 but it is already fixed in .2." (which will come in a few days). This would have been useful weeks ago (where I also was looking around, what is up with DrKonqi), but now? I never intended to blame anyone, least of all Jekyll. I just thought that it could be quite useful. Unfortunately, the idea to check the release schedule came to late (more specifically, directly *after* my comment... ;-) ). Sorry for the noise. |