Summary: | Clicking on column headers does not sort ascending or descending | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] kmail2 | Reporter: | tprotopopescu |
Component: | UI | Assignee: | kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | kde, kdenis |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 4.10 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | openSUSE | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
tprotopopescu
2013-02-22 17:00:25 UTC
I notice that this behavior is actually a regression, hence change from minor to normal. Kmail 1 had the ability to sort columns ascending or descending by clicking on the column header (I had occasion to use kmail 1.13 on KDE 4.5 and found it had this functionality) I'd suggest to rename bug, since KMail2 don't even sort normally with manual sorting (and it also ignores accounts order from settings) (and s/opensuse/all/) in platform This bug has only been reported for versions before 4.14, which have been unsupported for at least two years now. Can anyone tell if this bug still present? If noone confirms this bug for a Framework-based version of kmail2 (version 5.0 or later, as part of KDE Applications 15.12 or later), it gets closed in about three months. in messageviewer (or how that part with list of letters is called) all works fine (so, reported bug itself is fixed). But it is related, I guess, issue with accounts/folders list, where sorting applies in hardly strange way :) Vadim, for your interest: There is a button in Configure KMail -> Accounts, below the account list, that let's you configure the order of your accounts. Clicking on the header above the folder list sorts according to your configured order, switching between ascending and descending. And also, thanks for your feedback! Yeah, I know about this button. And, as I said earlier, kmail ignores accounts order, that I specified there. Or, at least, I don't know how to force it to respect it ;) http://i.imgur.com/5x6Rr4S.png Eeerm. I just checked it once more and it works fine. So, nevermind ;) |