Summary: | Applying filters while ignoring their options blocks too many legitimate webpages. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Frameworks and Libraries] kwebkitpart | Reporter: | Nikita Skovoroda <chalkerx> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | webkit-devel |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | adawit, thomas |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 1.3.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://ckeditor.com | ||
Latest Commit: | http://commits.kde.org/kwebkitpart/040905ba853ce1707f8f794babc45f0d0e702f73 | Version Fixed In: | 1.3-git |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Nikita Skovoroda
2012-11-16 21:12:28 UTC
*** Bug 314707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Git commit 040905ba853ce1707f8f794babc45f0d0e702f73 by Dawit Alemayehu. Committed on 10/02/2013 at 06:17. Pushed by adawit into branch '1.3'. For now let us disable filters with options since we can't correctly support them. FIXED-IN: 1.3-git M +2 -4 src/settings/webkit_filter.cpp http://commits.kde.org/kwebkitpart/040905ba853ce1707f8f794babc45f0d0e702f73 (In reply to comment #2) > FIXED-IN: 1.3-git Cool, thanks. Is it possible to white-list a domain because as stated in Bug #314707 this renders webkit unusable for ownCloud 5+ and packagers (Ubuntu) are very slow in updating webkitpart. Sorry btw, I didn't realize this was about the same issue. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > FIXED-IN: 1.3-git > > Cool, thanks. Is it possible to white-list a domain because as stated in Bug > #314707 this renders webkit unusable for ownCloud 5+ and packagers (Ubuntu) > are very slow in updating webkitpart. > > Sorry btw, I didn't realize this was about the same issue. The white listing is not something that can be done since we do not control the ad block rules. The best I probably can do is tag 1.3.2 and make an announcement. That should prompt packagers to update their packages. (In reply to comment #4) > The best I probably can do is tag 1.3.2 and make an announcement. That > should prompt packagers to update their packages. That would be great. Thanks :-) |