Summary: | C++ namespace support still broken | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] kdevelop | Reporter: | thealx |
Component: | Language Support: CPP (old) | Assignee: | KDevelop-Devel List <kdevelop-devel> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 2.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Debian testing | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
thealx
2001-08-17 07:31:48 UTC
What this boils down to: * Namespace support in parsing and class creation, and where else it would be appropriate (of course you can't just "add new namespace" :) * UI for browsing namespaces: I think it's adequate what do you think? * The navigation comboxes, does anybody use them? :) There ought to be a namespaces box, too or fully qualified class names should be present, which is better? Note one should be able to access inner classes from there, too.... Also pertinent is an inner namespace bug: Inner namespaces are displayed both at top and in the appropriate location, wow how similar is that to inner class bug? :) I think now everybody can agree that the Visual Studio mentality goes only this far, this being a very very small distance. KDevelop 3 has full support for namespaces Moving all the bugs from the CPP Parser. It was not well defined the difference between it and C++ Language Support and people kept reporting in both places indistinctively |