Summary: | GROUP : Sorting the image-groups by name in main image view, when the images are grouped in albums. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Andrey <senjas> |
Component: | Albums-ItemGroup | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles, mohammed.ahmed.anwer, smit.meh |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 2.8.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | openSUSE | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | http://commits.kde.org/digikam/3417e0e0a123c5ce6b734d250c95dbb2f3334248 | Version Fixed In: | 4.3.0 |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Andrey
2012-09-02 13:41:47 UTC
Hi Andrey Just to confirm, are you expecting a descending order in the tree of albums, in the pane which is on the left? Or in main view area where all the pics are shown, and you want the pics to be grouped album wise, where album should appear in a descending order? Smit I mean the latter: main view area with the thumbnails of the pictures grouped album wise. There seems to be no way to change it, other that choosing Descending order (which actually doesn't change the order of Albums). Tree of albums has its own order, which changes by clicking on "My Albums" label. I think that's quite convenient and works exactly as it should. Andrey Correct. I suspected so. But the current implementation is about sorting the images only, and not about sorting the image-groups (albums, tags). These functions just sort the images on the basis of their name, etc. internally within the albums, and not the albums themselves. But yes, it could be a nice feature if we wanted to do that. I will change the bug-definition to wish list, and slightly modify the bug-summary. Smit Hi Smit, That was my original thought. But using other settings Image-groups sorting does change. I have created 3 albums to test it: 2001 2002 2003 Using "Edit Albums" I have set the year to each folder (2001 to 2001 and so on, by default all folders have the same date, so this test won't work). These settings... 1.View -> Sort Images -> By Date 2.View -> Image Sorting Order -> Descending 3.View -> Group Images -> By Album ...produce this order: 2003 2002 2001 These settings... 1.View -> Sort Images -> By Date 2.View -> Image Sorting Order -> Ascending 3.View -> Group Images -> By Album ...produce this order: 2001 2002 2003 As, you see, current behavior seems inconsistent: if you use Sort Images -> By Date, order of albums does change, but if you use Sort Images -> By Name, order of Albums doe not change. This made me think that it is a bug. I have tried to find similar bug reports and stumbled upon some comments about removed menu entries considering sorting of Albums (there is no way to sort them now), so that might be related to this bug/inconsistency. I cant right now explain the phenomenon described in #4, regarding the original bug: There a method setCategorizationSortOrder in ImageSortSettings which implements the requested setting, but it's not used from the UI, so the default order should always apply, which is ascending. @Andrey, Yes, I confirm this inconsistency. We will look into it and see what we can do. Thanks for your replies. @Marcel Should we include another UI option to handle this? This was intentionally omitted from the UI, some things are just too much. May be we can set the same sort order as for the images. Any updates on this issue? I tried digikam 3.1.0, I still observe the same behavior: If I choose sorting by path, then Albums with previews are sorted Ascending, not matter what the settings are. If I choose sorting by name, then Albums with previews are shown according to Ascending/Descending setting in View - Image Sorting Order. Andrey , I am working on it currently. |