Bug 301618

Summary: kgpg 2.7.3 does not show key signatures properly.
Product: [Applications] kgpg Reporter: Marcos A. Lenharo <lenharo>
Component: generalAssignee: Rolf Eike Beer <kde>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: lenharo, mail, tiposchi
Priority: NOR    
Version: 2.7.x   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Arch Linux   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: http://commits.kde.org/kgpg/2d252cf08c51866a6acebe705db11b29941691bf Version Fixed In: 4.8.5
Attachments: gpg --lis-keys output
Kgpg window

Description Marcos A. Lenharo 2012-06-11 05:38:25 UTC 
As example, after importing same keys from Bug 292405 - KGpg shows wrong key ID for certain keys (0x7282B245 and 0x7CD2EAED) and expanding the keys, the key signatures are display as they were generated by same key.
gpg --list-sigs shows the right signatures.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Remove .gnupg folder
2. Create a new one executing gpg command
3. Start kgpg
4. Import keys 0x7282B245 and 0x7CD2EAED
5. On key manager, expand both keys in order to see key signatures and subkeys

Actual Results:  
All key signatures as listed as if they were generated by same key (same Name, Email and ID).

Expected Results:  
Right properties of each key used to signed the imported key should be shown.

I will attach a screenshot from KGPG and the output from gpg --list-sigs.
Comment 1 Marcos A. Lenharo 2012-06-11 05:39:03 UTC 
Created attachment 71724 [details]
gpg --lis-keys output
Comment 2 Marcos A. Lenharo 2012-06-11 05:41:24 UTC 
Created attachment 71725 [details]
Kgpg window
Comment 3 Rolf Eike Beer 2012-06-11 17:59:16 UTC 
Git commit 2d252cf08c51866a6acebe705db11b29941691bf by Rolf Eike Beer.
Committed on 11/06/2012 at 19:29.
Pushed by dakon into branch 'KDE/4.8'.

fix key comparison returning wrong values

This fixes a regression introduced in 4.8.2 with commit
2a100ae8d203107d17e438f67f65d26a4949cccc when trying to fix bug 292405.
Related: bug 298465, bug 292405

M  +7    -5    core/KGpgKeyNode.cpp

http://commits.kde.org/kgpg/2d252cf08c51866a6acebe705db11b29941691bf
Comment 4 Marcos A. Lenharo 2012-06-12 01:54:19 UTC 
Wow, that was fast!

Compiled, tested and running on my PC.
Thank you!
Comment 5 Rolf Eike Beer 2012-06-17 10:10:52 UTC 
*** Bug 302041 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Rolf Eike Beer 2012-06-30 09:04:19 UTC 
*** Bug 302782 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***