| Summary: | Contents of inline namespaces not treated as part of surrounding namespace (C++11) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] kdevelop | Reporter: | John <john5342> |
| Component: | Language Support: CPP (old) | Assignee: | kdevelop-bugs-null |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | craftplace.ms |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Compiled Sources | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
confirmed I tried to reproduce the bug - bar, baz, clazz are displayed. http://i.imgur.com/pV0JkVc.png Probably it is necessary to close. Hello! We are working on a new clang-based C/C++ language plugin for KDevelop 5 which supersedes the old C++ plugin in KDevelop 4. See e.g.: https://www.kdevelop.org/news/first-beta-release-kdevelop-500-available Due to a lack of manpower, we cannot fix bugs in the old C++ plugin. We rather want to supply a good Clang based C++ experience for KDevelop 5 than wasting our time on the legacy C++ support for KDevelop 4. With the new clang-based C/C++ language plugin, the bug presented here does not occur. In my testing. For these reasons, I'll close this bug. Please stay tuned for KDevelop 5. If you think this bug is applicable to Clang/KDevelop 5, please reopen the report and add new information on how to reproduce the bug there. Sorry for the inconvenience, I hope you understand the reasoning above. Cheers |
Version: unspecified (using KDE 4.8.0) OS: Linux The contents of inline namespaces should in most respects be treated as though they are members of the enclosing namespace. Currently Kdevelop doesn't seem to do that. Kdevelop Version: 4.2.81 Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Insert the following code in a C++11 project (| is current cursor position): namespace foo { inline namespace bar { void baz(); class clazz { /* ... */}; } } int main(int argc, char ** argv) { foo::| } Actual Results: Only bar is listed as a completion. Expected Results: baz and clazz should have been listed as completions in addition to bar. In addition to the above if clazz is manually completed "foo::clazz a1;" then clazz is not underlined (seems accepted as valid syntax) but no completion for members of a1 are provided.