| Summary: | s/uninitialilsed/uninitialized/ everywhere in the memcheck sources | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Developer tools] valgrind | Reporter: | Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr> |
| Component: | memcheck | Assignee: | Julian Seward <jseward> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | flo2030 |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 3.7 SVN | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Unlisted Binaries | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Timur Iskhodzhanov
2011-10-27 14:55:36 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > http://www.google.com/search?q=uninitialized -> 2.4KK results > http://www.google.com/search?q=uninitialised -> 180K results, most of them > citing Valgrind > > 2.4KK > 10 * 180K > Bollocks. What kind of argument is this? Yeah. Also, British English works OK for me :-) gcc uses "initialized". I don't insist much, just prefer when tools from the same ecosystem use the same language. Feel free to ignore if this isn't enough to convince. // Background on "why?" - see bug 256525, had to support both // Memcheck:Uninitialized and Memcheck:Uninitialised after // getting the latter due to vim autocompletion :) |