Summary: | Header and Footer are missing in the attached document | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] calligrawords | Reporter: | swathi <swathi.vegesna999> |
Component: | doc | Assignee: | Sebastian Sauer <mail> |
Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | sebsauer |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Unlisted Binaries | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: | |||
Attachments: |
Screenshot in MS Office
Screenshot in Calligra Words Screenshot in Latest Calligra Words |
Description
swathi
2011-09-13 09:06:04 UTC
Created attachment 63612 [details]
Screenshot in Calligra Words
Looks as this shows an interesting violation of the ODF standard. The header is defined in the styles.xml as; <style:master-page style:name="Standard1" style:display-name="Standard" style:page-layout-name="Mpm1"> <style:header>...</style:header> </style:master-page> The content.xml does then reference the master-page like; <style:style style:name="P5" style:family="paragraph" style:master-page-name="Standard" style:parent-style-name="Standard"> ... </style:style> As we see the paragraphStyle uses the name "Standard" which is the display-name of the master-page that should only be used for display purposes. The master-page itself defines the style-name "Standard1" (note the "1") and not "Standard" (without the "1"). It's absolute unclear to me why OO.org does still connect the master-page with the paragraphStyle even if they both are using different names. In any case this is not what the ODF standard suggests should be done. Fixed with 5d5444dedbf1b829b04b75f9d7b67fc40dd6ab34 Created attachment 65150 [details]
Screenshot in Latest Calligra Words
Tested in 9c203a706dc37927b69367b9c91d8f952fcf0b18.Still email id and some text in the footer is missing.Please check the screenshot attached.
This is not what the bug was about. The bug was about "Header and Footer are missing in the attached document" (see subject) and that was fixed (see analysis done in comment 2 and the fix landed in comment 3). If there are still issues with the document then we should create a new bugreport for those issues. That bugreport should be specific to the issues (email id and some text in the footer is missing). FYI: the issue the bugreport was about is 100% (not even 99.99% but 100%!) unrelated to what is described at comment #4. Thanks. Marking as Verified based on the Comment #5. We will raise a seperate bug for the missing email id. |