Summary: | Thumbnails are not properly displayed, while they are OK in "view image" mode | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | philippe.quaglia |
Component: | Thumbs-Image | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | althio.forum, caulier.gilles |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 2.0.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Ubuntu | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 2.5.0 | |
Sentry Crash Report: | |||
Attachments: | On the left, broken thumbnails, on the right, all ok in view mode |
Description
philippe.quaglia
2011-08-12 11:06:22 UTC
Created attachment 62774 [details]
On the left, broken thumbnails, on the right, all ok in view mode
This is very weird, because the main thumbnail view is built on the same codebase than the one-line thumbnail view. Does this happen only with specific images? Are these always the same images even after a restart? Does pressing F5 help? Are there any error messages on the console while opening the album? Hello Marcel, I have restarted my computer, then, the thumbnails where ok, excepted 3 of them. Then I pressed F5, as you mentionned, and the 3 thumbnails have been corrected. I'm now doing some tests with other folders. Most of the time, few thumbnails are broken, but it is then repaired when I press F5. So I guess this is ok ? I will let you know if I find out something else (but in the meantime, I had a crash, so I will send a crash report). Best regards. Philippe. Le 12/08/2011 19:32, Marcel Wiesweg a écrit : > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279954 > > > > > > --- Comment #2 from Marcel Wiesweg<marcel wiesweg gmx de> 2011-08-12 17:32:28 --- > This is very weird, because the main thumbnail view is built on the same > codebase than the one-line thumbnail view. > Does this happen only with specific images? Are these always the same images > even after a restart? Does pressing F5 help? Are there any error messages on > the console while opening the album? > It still valid using 2.4.0 release ? Gilles Caulier I have not seen this bug since the new releases |