Summary: | jpeg-turbo support : can't edit canon 400D jpg | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Bartek Pietrasiak <pietras.sp> |
Component: | Plugin-DImg-JPEG | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | caulier.gilles |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 2.0.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Compiled Sources | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 3.0.0 | |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Bartek Pietrasiak
2011-05-24 17:53:41 UTC
You use really 0.6.2 ? digiKam will support jpeg-turbo with next 2.0.0-beta6 (current code from git master repository) Gilles Caulier No, I use code from git. I used the report bug dialog in digikam, which reported wrong version. Can you provide a sample file? Could be a libjpeg-turbo issue. I tried, but picture too big to atach. But it is not a problem with format. I copied the jpg to some subalbum and no problem, I can edit them, but in the old location still the same. I think that it might be some raw+jpgeg problem. With new set of files the same problem, but the first jpeg in album can be edited, the rest not :/ Send to me by private mail, I will copy it to our test images collection. If the mail is too large and rejected by your mail provider, there is good old Unix "split" to split it. Test images are here: http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/TEST_IMAGES/RAW/HORIZONTAL/IMG_8135.CR2 http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/TEST_IMAGES/JPEG/Horizontal/IMG_8135.JPG As expected, no problem with normal libjpeg. A libjpeg-turbo regression? I dont have access to a libjpeg-turbo system at the moment. Same for me. I waiting next lead Mandriva update, but i'm not sure if jpegturbo will be integrated. Gilles Caulier I forget to put the comment after sending the files. I was playing a bit with this problem and discovered that it only happened when the raw and jpeg was in the same directory after import. When I removed the raw files, I could edit the jpegs. It was not easy to reproduce, since after deleting all files and importing again, the problem didn't occure. I was playing a bit, but I'm not able to provide some steps how to reproduce it. Bartek, This file still valid using 2.9.0 ? Gilles Caulier I think that not valid |