Bug 267491

Summary: "Edit Multiline Paste" dialog's "Send" button appears as "OK"
Product: [Applications] konversation Reporter: William Kendrick <nbs>
Component: generalAssignee: Konversation Developers <konversation-devel>
Status: RESOLVED NOT A BUG    
Severity: minor CC: hein, nbs
Priority: NOR    
Version: 1.3.1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Unlisted Binaries   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments: Screenshot of Multiline Paste Editor on my system

Description William Kendrick 2011-03-02 19:26:37 UTC
Created attachment 57616 [details]
Screenshot of Multiline Paste Editor on my system

Version:           1.3.1 (using KDE 4.6.0) 
OS:                Linux

I accidentally double-pasted to #kde and got razzed for it, because I didn't realize that clicking "OK" in the multiline editor would send the message (I expected the previous dialog window, "Paste Warning", to reappear; when it didn't, I tried pasting again, this time without going to the editor first).

Sho_ on #kde states that the multiline editor's dismiss buttons should be "Send" and "Cancel", but I am seeing "OK" and "Cancel".

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Middle-click to paste a multiline copied buffer into an IRC channel, click "Edit..." when the "Paste Warning" dialog appears.

Actual Results:  
OK and Cancel shown.

Expected Results:  
Send and Cancel shown.

Using KDE 4.6 backports to Ubuntu 10.10.
Comment 1 Eike Hein 2011-03-02 19:27:47 UTC
It's already "Send".
Comment 2 William Kendrick 2011-03-02 19:29:14 UTC
Sho_ on #kde directed me to https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/network/konversation/repository/revisions/master/entry/src/viewer/pasteeditor.cpp which shows that the code had "&Send" as the button label, so it's either been addressed in a future version, or there's something wrong with my copy of Konversation...?
Comment 3 Eike Hein 2011-03-02 19:35:57 UTC
Sorry, my bad (I'm Sho_) - I was pretty sure this was done *before* 1.3.1 and went the online repo viewer for confirmation, selected the 1.3.1 tag there but must have done something while browsing along to lose that qualification, and ended up giving you a link to a version of the source file that's in fact newer than what's in 1.3.1 without realizing it.