Summary: | OOMed after memory usage set to aggressive | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] okular | Reporter: | Grissiom <chaos.proton> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Okular developers <okular-devel> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | crash | CC: | aacid |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Slackware | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Grissiom
2010-12-11 13:59:17 UTC
> I think it should use a limited percent of the whole RAM even when aggressive
> memory usage is set.
This is what it does, usually.
In your case, it didn't seem to be that bad, consiering you set it as "aggressive". Did you launch some other application when okular crashed?
(Also, looks like you don't have swap enabled; even a very bit of swap would generally help, not just for this case.)
Also, what version is your kernel (`uname -a`)?
No other RAM consuming apps running when okular crashed. I noticed okular used almost 1GB cache. Is that normal? uname -a is: Linux darkstar 2.6.37-rc5-corei3-00062-g6313e3c #17 SMP PREEMPT Thu Dec 9 00:13:15 CST 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU M 370 @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux (I have to use the latest kernel to get hardware support) Yes, I'm considering add some swap to the system. But that would be an other story ;) You told it to be agreesive, so it is, so yes 1GB of cache is normal if you are not using any other program and you had opened a big pdf file. There were a few bugs in free memory calculation, they have been ironed out for the KDE Applications 4.9 release due next week, this should be fixed by those changes. If you can still reproduce the problem after updating to that version or newer please reopen the bug. Thanks for caring about Okular :-) |