| Summary: | consider making shutdown dialog timeout shorter | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Plasma] plasmashell | Reporter: | Oliver Henshaw <oliver.henshaw> |
| Component: | Theme - Breeze | Assignee: | Lubos Lunak <l.lunak> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | bugzilla, jwelsh, kainz.a, nate, plasma-bugs-null |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | master | ||
| Target Milestone: | 1.0 | ||
| Platform: | Fedora RPMs | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Oliver Henshaw
2010-10-06 18:12:30 UTC
I'd rather like to configure the time before the automatic action takes place: endless = disable countdown, dialog stays there until user does something, and 60, 30, 10 seconds or so. I agree 30 seconds seems like a bad compromise. If, as I argue in #313480, these prompts are viewed as separate cases of safety prompts for the explicit shutdown/logout options, and requests for further information for the generic "Leave" options, it might make sense to have a 10-second timeout on the former and none on the latter. *** Bug 360298 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Submitted a patch: https://phabricator.kde.org/D27077 Let's see where it goes. It didn't go anywhere. :) Nobody was in favor, so I'm afraid I have to close this bug as RESOLVED INTENTIONAL. You can see the discussion in https://phabricator.kde.org/D27077 for details. If anyone can articulate a strong reason there why 10 seconds is better than 30, it might be possible to revisit the matter. |