Summary: | Not Safe For Work feature | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Sergey <tovarish> |
Component: | Albums-MainView | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles, friiduh, simon.eu |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version First Reported In: | 1.5.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | openSUSE | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 2.5.0 | |
Sentry Crash Report: | |||
Attachments: | example |
Description
Sergey
2010-08-26 18:44:53 UTC
Created attachment 50984 [details]
example
Great idea! Have been thinking about something like that as well. I guess everyone has public (landscapes, ...) and private (holidays, friends, ...) pictures. Being able to show public pictures only would make digicam ways more interesting for public presentations. Just thinking about whether a simple flag is enough. Perhaps it is. Simon http://imagebin.ca/view/0wfCR77a.html I would take something like that. I can not find anything other usefull way than having a "locked" or "hidden" tag what can be applied to photos. But should that tag be written to metadata itself or just for database? Then there would be the setting somewhere to "show/hide" or "lock/unlock" to switch mode when the thumbnail is hided and you can not open them to preview (they are skipped in next/last or in presentation mode). The file name should be hided so it can not be finded from filemanager. But tags I think could be shown. The tag could be just so easy because then all the searches and all could be done more like "execlude this tag" until user switch the option. (And if that option would need a password.... ;) ) I'd vote for in-file metadata. Wouldn't want to do the same tagging twice on the PC and the laptop. Sergey, With digiKam 2.x serie, Pick and Color Labels have been implemented and can be used to flag image in your workflow... Gilles Caulier |