Summary: | digiKam hate my image (file truncated to 0 byte after tagging) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Marc Aurel <marc-keyword-kdebug.e348b5> |
Component: | Tags-Engine | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | major | CC: | caulier.gilles, javier |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 1.3.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Unlisted Binaries | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 5.1.0 | |
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Marc Aurel
2010-08-04 23:44:54 UTC
which libkexiv2 and exiv2 versions are installed? There's Help->components info. Can you reproduce the RAW files being touched when changing a tag? Hello Marcel, thanks for your interest in this bug. According to Help / Components Information, the installed versions are: LibKExiv2 1.1.0 LibExiv2 0.19 To verify whether the files are being touched, I used md5sum to get a hash of a CRW file, then added a tag to the image in digiKam (making sure I "applied" the change - the status line said "Writing metadata to files") and checked the hash again: before: 7cbc560040ce396d5e0ce0362c92c382 CRW_0305.CRW after: 7cbc560040ce396d5e0ce0362c92c382 CRW_0305.CRW There goes my theory. But why would a RAW image file be truncated to zero bytes if it's not even touched?
> But why would a RAW image file be truncated to zero bytes
> if it's not even touched?
I'd like to know that as well ;-)
But that is very difficult to tell when we cannot reliably reproduce the problem.
digiKam 1.6.0 is out: http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/550 Please update and check if this entry still valid. Thanks in advance Gilles Caulier I had a similar problem. I have my collection at one place but wanted to share some pics through Dropbox so I hardlinked them into a dir under the Dropbox dir. After modifying tags, the files are truncated every time. Tested this to a dir not watched by Dropbox and it happens just the same. Still happens with 1.9.0. We need feedback using a recent version. 2.0.0 RC is out, please test... Thanks in advance Gilles Caulier Javier, 1) we can forget about the dropbox and hardlink story, your files are reproducibly truncated to 0 bytes when applying a tag regardless where they are located? 2) Which file format? 3) Which libkexiv2/libexiv2 version? Go to Help components for details. Javier, Do you see comment #8 ? Marc, This file still valid using digiKam 2.4 ? Gilles Caulier Official digiKam 2.6.0 release is out since few days now : http://www.digikam.org/drupal/node/656 Please, check if this entry still valid, or update report accordingly. Thanks in advance. Gilles Caulier This file still valid with digiKam 3.5.0 ? Gilles Caulier New digiKam 4.11.0 is available : https://www.digikam.org/node/740 Can you reproduce the problem with this release ? With digiKam 5.0.0, this problem is not reproducible. I close this file now. Don't hesitate to re-open if necessary. Gilles Caulier |